Back

Modeling and Simulation of CAR T cell Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients

Nukala, U.; Rodriguez Messan, M.; Yogurtcu, O. N.; Zuben, S.; Yang, H.

2022-12-01 oncology
10.1101/2022.12.01.22282976 medRxiv
Show abstract

Advances in genetic engineering have made it possible to reprogram an individuals immune cells to express receptors that recognize markers on tumor cell surfaces. The process of re-engineering T cell lymphocytes to express Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARs) and reinfusing the CAR-modified T cells into patients to treat various cancers is being explored in clinical trials. While the majority of patients with some cancers (e.g., B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia) respond to CAR-T cell therapy, this success is not evidenced in all cancers. For example, only 26% of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients respond to CAR T cell therapy. Understanding of the factors associated with an individual patients response is important for patient selection and could help develop more effective CAR T cell therapies. Here we present a mechanistic mathematical model to identify factors associated with responses to CAR T cell therapeutic interventions. The proposed model is a system of coupled ordinary differential equations designed based on known immunological principles and prevailing hypotheses on the mechanism of CAR T cell kinetics, Interleukin 6 (IL-6) secretion, and tumor killing in CAR T cell therapy. The model reports in silico disease outcomes using B cell concentration as a surrogate biomarker. Our results are consistent with the in vitro experimental observations that CAR T cell fitness in terms of its tumor cell killing capacity and proliferation plays an important role in the patient response. We demonstrate the utility of mathematical modelling in understanding the factors that play an important role in patient response to CAR T cell therapy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.8%
2
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
6
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
8
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
12
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
13
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
20
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%