Back

A high throughput splicing assay to investigate the effect of variants of unknown significance on exon inclusion

Scott, H. A.; Place, E.; Harper, E.; Mehrotra, S.; Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute, ; Huckfeldt, R.; Comander, J.; Pierce, E. A.; Bujakowska, K. M.

2022-12-06 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.11.30.22282952 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeInconclusive interpretation of pathogenicity of variants is a common problem in Mendelian disease diagnostics. We hypothesized that some variants of unknown significance (VUS) may lead to aberrant pre-mRNA splicing. To address this we have developed a high throughput splicing assay (HTSA) than can be utilized to test the effects of 1000s of variants on exon recognition. Methods2296 reference, control and variant sequences from 380 exons of 89 genes associated with inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) were cloned as a pool into a split-GFP HTSA construct and expressed in landing pad RCA7 HEK293T cells. Exon inclusion led to disruption of GFP and exon skipping led to GFP reconstitution, enabling to separate GFP+ve and GFP-ve cells by fluorescence activated cell sorting. After deep sequencing-based quantification of studied sequences in each cell pool, exon inclusion index (EII) was determined, where EII = GFP-ve oligo count/total oligo count. ResultsHTSA showed high reproducibility when compared between different biological replicates (tetrachoric correlation coefficient r2 = 0.83). Reference exon sequences showed a high level of exon recognition (median EII = 0.88) which was significantly reduced by mutations to the essential splice sites (donor site variants: median EII=0.06; acceptor site variants: median EII=0.48). Of the 748 studied VUSs, 47 variants led to decreased exon inclusion ({Delta}EII [≤] -0.3) with 11 variants showing a strong effect ({Delta}EII [≤] -0,6). Using the HTSA data we were able to provide a likely genetic diagnosis to five IRD cases. ConclusionHTSA offers a robust method to study the effects of VUSs on exon recognition allowing to provide new diagnoses for patients with Mendelian disorders.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
19
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
26
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%