Back

Deep learning application to automatic classification of pharmacist interventions.

Alkanj, A.; Godet, J.; Johns, E.; Gourieux, B.; Michel, B.

2022-12-05 health informatics
10.1101/2022.11.30.22282942 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPharmacist Interventions (PIs) are actions proposed by pharmacists during the prescription review process to address non-optimal drug use. PIs must be triggered by drug-related problems (DRP) but can also be recommendations for better prescribing and administration practices. PIs are produced daily text documents and messages forwarded to prescribers. Although they could be used retrospectively to build on safeguards for preventing DRP, the reuse of the PIs data is under-exploited. ObjectiveThe objective of this work is to train a deep learning algorithm able to automatically categorize PIs to value this large amount of data. Materials and MethodsThe study was conducted at the University Hospital of Strasbourg. PIs data was collected over the year 2017. Data from the first six months of 2017 was labelled by two pharmacists, who manually assigned one of the 29 possible classes from the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy classification. A deep neural network classifier was trained to learn to automatically predict the class of PIs from the processed text data. Results27,699 labelled PIs were used to train and evaluate a classifier. The accuracy of the prediction calculated on the validation dataset was 78.0%. We predicted classes for the PIs collected in the second half of 2017. Of the 4,460 predictions checked manually, 67 required corrections. These verified data was concatenated with the original dataset to create an extended dataset to re-train the neural network. The accuracy achieved was 81.0 %, showing that the prediction process can be further improved as the amount of data increases. ConclusionsPIs classification is beneficial for assessing and improving pharmaceutical care practice. Here we report a high-performance automatic classification of PIs based on deep learning that could find a place in highlighting the clinical relevance of the drug prescription review performed daily by hospital pharmacists.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.7%
5
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
29
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%