Identifying patients requiring treatment for depression in the postpartum period from common electronic medical record data available antepartum using machine learning
Wakefield, C.; Frasch, M. G.
Show abstract
ObjectiveDepression requiring treatment in the postpartum period (PPD) significantly impacts maternal and neonatal health. While preventive management of depression in pregnancy has been shown to decrease the negative effects, current methods for identifying at-risk patients are insufficient. Given the complexity of the diagnosis and interplay of clinical/demographic factors, we tested if machine learning (ML) techniques can accurately identify patients at risk of PPD. Study DesignThis is a retrospective cohort study of the NIH Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study (nuMoM2b) which enrolled 10,038 nulliparous people. The primary outcome was PPD. We constructed and optimized four ML models using distributed random forest modeling based on the nuMoM2b dataset. Model 1 utilized only readily obtainable sociodemographic data. Model 2 added maternal pre-pregnancy mental health data. Model 3 utilized recursive feature elimination to construct a parsimonious model. Model 4 further titrated the input data to exclude pre-pregnancy mental health variables. ResultsOf 8454 births, 338 (4%) were complicated by PPD. Model 3 was the highest performing, demonstrating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.91({+/-}0.02). Models 1-3 identified the 9 variables most predictive of depression hierarchically ranging from BMI (highest), prior depression, age, income, medications, education, past medical history, race, and prior anxiety (lowest). In model 4, the AUC remained at 0.80({+/-}0.04). ConclusionsCounterintuitively, the presence of pre-pregnancy mental health conditions is not the most predictive factor of PPD. Furthermore, PPD can be predicted with high accuracy for individual patients using antepartum information commonly found in the EMR.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to trauma in pregnant women and its association with previous perinatal complications, IPV and antenatal service satisfaction in rural Ethiopia: a cross-sectional facility-based study 94%
- A cross-national study of factors associated with women’s perinatal mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal adverse childhood experiences on child growth and development in rural Pakistan: an observational cohort study 94%
- Real world external validation of metabolic gestational age assessment in Kenya 93%
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Twitter Data for Cohort Studies of Drug Safety in Pregnancy: A Proof-of-Concept with Beta-Blockers 93%
- Development of the NeuroFlow Severity Score and Comparison With Validated Measures for Depression and Anxiety 92%
- Identifying Women at Risk for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Using a Mobile Health Application 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 94%
- The prevalence of mental ill-health in women during pregnancy and after childbirth during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis 94%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.