Population mortality impacts of the rising cost of living in Scotland: modelling study
Richardson, E.; McCartney, G.; Taulbut, M.; Douglas, M.; Craig, N.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo estimate the potential impacts of unmitigated and mitigated cost of living increases on real household income, mortality, and mortality inequalities in Scotland. DesignModelling study. SettingScotland, 2022/23. ParticipantsA representative sample of 5,602 Scottish individuals (within 2,704 households) in the 2015/16 Family Resources Survey. We estimated changes in real household income associated with differential price inflation (based on proportion of household spending on different goods and services, by income group), both with and without mitigating UK Government policies, and scaled these to the Scottish population. We estimated mortality effects using a cross-sectional relationship between household income and mortality data, by deprivation group. InterventionsBaseline was Scotland in 2022/23 with the average wage and price inflation of preceding years. The comparison scenarios were unmitigated cost of living increases, and mitigation by the UK Governments Energy Price Guarantee (EPG) and Cost of Living Support payments. Main outcome measuresPremature mortality rate and life expectancy at birth by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) group, and inequalities in both. ResultsUnmitigated price inflation was 14.9% for the highest income group and 22.9% for the lowest. UK Government policies partially mitigated impacts of the rising cost of living on real incomes, although households in the most deprived areas of Scotland would still be {pound}1,400 per year worse off than at baseline. With the mitigating measures in place, premature mortality was estimated to increase by up to 6.4%, and life expectancy to decrease by up to 0.9%. Effects would be greater in more deprived areas, and inequalities would increase as a result. ConclusionsLarge and inequitable impacts on mortality in Scotland are predicted if real-terms income reductions are sustained. Progressive Cost of Living Support payments are not sufficient to offset the mortality impacts of the greater real income reductions in deprived areas. What is already known on this topicO_LIOver the last decade, life expectancy in Scotland has stalled and inequalities have increased. C_LIO_LIIncome reductions have been related to increased mortality risk, hence the economy matters for public health. C_LIO_LIThe impacts of the rising cost of living and mitigating policies on mortality and inequalities require estimation to inform policymaking. C_LI What this study addsO_LIThe mortality impacts of inflation and real-terms income reduction are likely to be large and negative, with marked inequalities in how these are experienced. C_LIO_LICurrent public policy responses are not sufficient to protect health and prevent widening inequalities. C_LIO_LIBolder and more progressive policy responses are required if health is to improve and health inequalities are to narrow. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changing probability of experiencing food insecurity by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK 93%
- Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series 91%
- Mortality among Care Home Residents in England during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of 4.3 million adults over the age of 65 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in psychological distress in Great Britain, 1991-2019: evidence from three representative surveys 94%
- Socioeconomic inequality in recent adverse mortality trends in Scotland. 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 infections in migrants and the role of household overcrowding: A causal mediation analysis of Virus Watch data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 93%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 93%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 91%
- The effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study 91%
- Changes in COVID-19-related mortality across key demographic and clinical subgroups: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform on 18 million adults in England 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK’s Covid-19 response with four European countries: Decision Modelling Study 94%
- A regression discontinuity analysis of the social distancing recommendations for older adults in Sweden during COVID-19 90%
- Excess mortality across regions of Europe during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic – impact of the winter holiday travelling and government responses 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.