Back

Does Inter-Protein Contact Prediction Benefit from Multi-Modal Data and Auxiliary Tasks?

Talukder, A.; Yin, R.; Sun, Y.; Shen, Y.; You, Y.

2022-12-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.11.29.518454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Approaches to in silico prediction of protein structures have been revolutionized by AlphaFold2, while those to predict interfaces between proteins are relatively underdeveloped, owing to the overly complicated yet relatively limited data of protein-protein complexes. In short, proteins are 1D sequences of amino acids folding into 3D structures, and interact to form assemblies to function. We believe that such intricate scenarios are better modeled with additional indicative information that reflects their multi-modality nature and multi-scale functionality. To improve binary prediction of inter-protein residue-residue contacts, we propose to augment input features with multi-modal representations and to synergize the objective with auxiliary predictive tasks. (i) We first progressively add three protein modalities into models: protein sequences, sequences with evolutionary information, and structure-aware intra-protein residue contact maps. We observe that utilizing all data modalities delivers the best prediction precision. Analysis reveals that evolutionary and structural information benefit predictions on the difficult and rigid protein complexes, respectively, assessed by the resemblance to native residue contacts in bound complex structures. (ii) We next introduce three auxiliary tasks via self-supervised pre-training (binary prediction of protein-protein interaction (PPI)) and multi-task learning (prediction of inter-protein residue-residue distances and angles). Although PPI prediction is reported to benefit from predicting inter-contacts (as causal interpretations), it is not found vice versa in our study. Similarly, the finer-grained distance and angle predictions did not appear to uniformly improve contact prediction either. This again reflects the high complexity of protein-protein complex data, for which designing and incorporating synergistic auxiliary tasks remains challenging.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.