Back

Factors affecting Transition Success and Satisfaction from Child to Adult Mental Health Services in the UK

Williams, P.; Willoughby, K.; Bennetts, A.; Brandt, V.

2022-11-29 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.11.29.22282875 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundQualitative research has identified factors affecting transition from child mental health services (CAMHS) to adult mental health services (AMHS) but it is unclear which of these factors may lead to disengagement from the young persons view. MethodsN= 272 participants (mean age = 20+/-2.31, 81% females) who had experience with the UK mental healthcare system (patients, carers, health workers) attempted the survey but only participants who had been treated in CAMHS were included in this study, resulting in a total N=144 (mean age = 19.8+/-2.3, 83% female). This study used a cross-sectional, quantitative survey assessing 12 pre-transition, 16 peri-transition, and 11 post-transition variables. The Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (CATS) was used to measure client attachment to CAMHS and AMHS therapists. ResultsSuccessful transition from CAMHS to AMHS was significantly predicted by using a helpful care plan, continuity of treatment between CAMHS and AMHS, and being engaged in a transition service. However, few clients were aware of transition services at the time of transition. Transition satisfaction was significantly predicted by the same variables. In addition, GP support during the transition, and a more secure attachment to AMHS therapists were associated with higher transition satisfaction. ConclusionsThe results suggest clients transition process might be significantly improved by focusing on useful individualised care plans, and ensuring continuity of treatment. Transition success and satisfaction could also be improved by making clients aware of and engaging them in transition services, involving GPs, and working on a secure attachment on the AMHS side.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.