Back

Multimodal MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for improved diagnosis of melanoma

Zhang, W.; Patterson, N. H.; Verbeeck, N.; Moore, J. L.; Ly, A.; Caprioli, R. M.; De Moor, B.; Norris, J. L.; Claesen, M.

2022-11-29 oncology
10.1101/2022.11.29.22282868 medRxiv
Show abstract

Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) provides promising avenues to augment histopathological investigation with rich spatio-molecular information. We have previously developed a classification model to differentiate melanoma from nevi lesions based on IMS protein data, a task that is challenging solely by histopathologic evaluation. Most IMS-focused studies collect microscopy in tandem with IMS data, but this microscopy data is generally omitted in downstream data analysis. Microscopy, nevertheless, forms the basis for traditional histopathology and thus contains invaluable morphological information. In this work, we developed a multimodal classification pipeline that uses deep learning, in the form of a pre-trained artificial neural network, to extract the meaningful morphological features from histopathological images, and combine it with the IMS data. To test whether this deep learning-based classification strategy can improve on our previous results in classification of melanocytic neoplasia, we utilized MALDI IMS data with collected serial H&E stained sections for 331 patients, and compared this multimodal classification pipeline to classifiers using either exclusively microscopy or IMS data. The multimodal pipeline achieved the best performance, with ROC-AUCs of 0.968 vs. 0.938 vs. 0.931 for the multimodal, unimodal microscopy and unimodal IMS pipelines respectively. Due to the use of a pre-trained network to perform the morphological feature extraction, this pipeline does not require any training on large amounts of microscopy data. As such, this framework can be readily applied to improve classification performance in other experimental settings where microscopy data is acquired in tandem with IMS experiments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
4
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
9
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
10
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
16
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
20
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Integrative Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%