Back

Profile of a flower: How rates of morphological evolution drive floral diversification in Ericales

Herting, J.; Schoenenberger, J.; Sauquet, H.

2022-11-29 plant biology
10.1101/2022.11.28.518258 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Premise of the StudyRecent studies of floral disparity in the asterid order Ericales have shown that flowers vary strongly among families and that disparity is unequally distributed between the three flower modules (perianth, androecium, gynoecium). However, it remains unknown whether these patterns are driven by heterogeneous rates of morphological evolution or other factors. MethodsHere, we compiled a dataset of 33 floral characters scored for 414 extant ericalean species sampled from 346 genera and all 22 families. We conducted ancestral state reconstructions using an equal rates Markov models for each trait. We used the rates estimated during the ancestral state reconstruction for comparing evolutionary rates between flower modules, creating a "rate profile" of ericalean flowers. Key ResultsThe androecium exhibits the highest evolutionary rates across most characters, whereas most perianth and gynoecium characters evolve slower. High and low rates of morphological evolution can result in high floral disparity in Ericales. Analyses of an angiosperm-wide floral dataset reveal that this pattern appears to be conserved across most major angiosperm clades. ConclusionsElevated rates of morphological evolution in the androecium of Ericales may explain the higher disparity reported for this floral module. We discuss the implications of heterogenous morphological rates of evolution among floral modules from a functional perspective. Comparing rates of morphological evolution through rate profiles proves to be a powerful tool in understanding floral evolution.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.5%
3
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
8
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
26
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%