Back

Streptococcus pyogenes colonization in children aged 24-59 months in The Gambia: Impact of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine and associated serological responses

Keeley, A. J.; Groves, D.; Armitage, E. P.; Senghore, E.; Jagne, Y. J.; Sallah, H. J.; Drammeh, S.; Angyal, A.; Hornsby, H.; de Crombrugghe, G.; Smeesters, P.; Rossi, O.; Carducci, M.; Peno, C.; Bogaert, D.; Kampmann, B.; Marks, M.; Shaw, H. A.; Turner, C. E.; de Silva, T. I.

2022-11-29 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.11.27.22282750 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImmunity to Streptococcus pyogenes in high burden settings is poorly understood. We explored S. pyogenes nasopharyngeal colonization after intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) among Gambian children aged 24-59 months, and resulting serological response to 7 antigens. MethodsA post-hoc analysis was performed in 320 children randomized to receive LAIV at baseline (LAIV group) or not (control). S. pyogenes colonization was determined by quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) on nasopharyngeal swabs from baseline (D0), day 7 (D7) and day 21 (D21). Anti-streptococcal IgG was quantified, including a subset with paired serum pre/post S. pyogenes acquisition. ResultsThe point prevalence of S. pyogenes colonization ranged from 7-13%. In children negative at D0, S. pyogenes was detected at D7 or D21 in 18% of LAIV group and 11% of control group participants (p=0.12). The odds ratio (OR) for colonization over time was significantly increased in the LAIV group (D21 vs D0 OR 3.18, p=0.003) but not in the control group (OR 0.86, p=0.79). The highest IgG increases following asymptomatic colonization were seen for M1 and SpyCEP proteins. ConclusionsAsymptomatic S. pyogenes colonization appears modestly increased by LAIV, and may be immunologically significant. LAIV could be used to study influenza-S. pyogenes interactions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.