Back

Analysis of hormonal regulation of promoter activities of Cannabis sativa prenyltransferase 1 and 4 and salicylic acid mediated regulation of cannabinoid biosynthesis

Sands, L.; Haiden, S. R.; Ma, Y.; Berkowitz, G.

2022-11-26 plant biology
10.1101/2022.11.25.517997 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cannabis sativa prenyltransferase 4 (CsPT4) and prenyltransferase 1 (CsPT1) have been shown to catalyze the step in the cannabinoid biosynthetic pathway that generates cannabigerolic acid (CBGA), the substrate for the end-point enzymes that generate cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA). Prior studies from our lab suggest that CBGA production rate-limits the pathway. There is a lack of understanding concerning how important cannabinoid biosynthetic genes are regulated as cannabinoid synthesis increases during female flower development. Both CsPT genes were shown to be highly expressed in flowers. The genes were also found to be present in leaves and roots. GUS staining also detected the promoter activities in leaves of seedlings, and the promoter activities were drastically stronger in the section of the sugar leaves where glandular trichomes are formed. In silico analysis of the two CsPT genes revealed several hormone and transcription factor responsive elements. Dual luciferase assays were conducted to determine whether a hormone could alter the promoter activities of CsPT1 and CsPT4. The results showed that CsPT4 pro was activated following treatment from salicylic acid (SA), gibberellic acid (GA), ethylene, ABA, and cytokinin, while the CsPT1 promoter was activated following SA, ethylene, ABA, and auxin treatment. In parallel studies, a correlation was observed between multiple cannabinoid biosynthetic pathway genes and SA application to the cannabis growing medium, along with a correlation between MeSA floral application and an increase in cannabinoid content. The results from all aspects of this study demonstrated an interaction between certain hormones and cannabinoid synthesis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.5%
3
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
4
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
Plant Cell Reports
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
7
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.3%
9
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
14
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.8%
22
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%