Impact of a multimodal hand hygiene improvement intervention in a 1000-bed hospital in Thailand: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
Hongsuwan, M.; Srisamang, P.; Nuntalohit, S.; Luangasanatip, N.; Lim, C.; Day, N. P.; Limmathurotsakul, D.; Cooper, B. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundGood hand hygiene compliance amongst healthcare workers is critical for patient safety and plays a central role in preventing healthcare-associated infections. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a multimodal strategy to improve healthcare worker hand hygiene. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy in a middle-income country using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. MethodsThe trial was conducted between 2013 and 2015 in 58 wards in a 1000-bed hospital in Thailand. The intervention was adapted from the WHOs Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy and implemented by the hospitals infection control team. The primary outcome was observed hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in the study wards. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01933087). FindingsDuring 4,230 observation sessions, 54,073 hand hygiene opportunities were identified. Hand hygiene compliance increased from 10.0% (2,660/26,482) to 11.0% (3,048/27,591) after the intervention (odds ratio [OR] 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01-1.24). Among the five moments for hand hygiene, the greatest improvement in compliance was observed in hand hygiene before patient contact (OR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.91). InterpretationWhile hand hygiene compliance improved slightly, the intervention failed to achieve the substantial improvements that were needed. There is a need for new strategies to ensure that all hospitals in low and middle-income countries can achieve and maintain acceptable levels of hand hygiene. FundingOak Foundation, MRC
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A rapid systematic review of measures to protect older people in long term care facilities from COVID-19 94%
- Factors affecting healthcare workers' compliance with social and behavioural infection control measures during emerging infectious disease outbreaks: Rapid evidence review. 94%
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risks and challenges in COVID-19 infection prevention and control in a hospital setting: perspectives of healthcare workers in Thailand 94%
- The critical role of infection prevention overlooked in Ethiopia, only one-half of health-care workers had safe practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 93%
- Stethoscope disinfection is rarely done in Ethiopia: what are the associated factors? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and effectiveness of hand hygiene-related practices used community settings for removal of organisms from hands: A systematic review 94%
- Progress in Epidemic Ready Primary Health Care: Early Pilot Results from Four African Countries (Ethiopia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Uganda), December 2023 – October 2024 92%
- Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a scoping review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare associated infection risk analysis at the obstetrics and gynecology department of a referral hospital in Cameroon 94%
- Non-adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines: findings from a mixed-methods study in a developing country 93%
- The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cleaning and disinfecting surfaces in hospitals and long-term care facilities for reducing hospital and facility-acquired bacterial and viral infections: A systematic review 94%
- Regional Variation in the Interpretation of Contact Precautions for Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a cross-sectional survey 92%
- Does Copper treating of commonly touched surfaces reduce healthcare acquired infections? A Systematic Review and meta-analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.