Back

Predicting Gastrointestinal Absorption of Prodrugs and their Drugs with the ANDROMEDA by Prosilico Software

Fagerholm, U.; Hellberg, S.; Alvarsson, J.; Spjuth, O.

2022-11-25 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2022.11.23.517725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSIntroductionC_ST_ABSSome prodrugs are developed in order to improve gastrointestinal absorption properties such as permeability and solubility/dissolution. Prediction of the uptake of prodrugs and their drugs is challening for reasons including gastrointestinal hydrolysis and active transport. Objective and MethodologyThe objective was to use the ANDROMEDA software by Prosilico to predict absorption characteristics - passive fraction absorbed (fa,passive), dose-adjusted dissolution potential (fdiss) and total fa (fa) - of prodrugs and their drugs (including drugs and their active metabolites), and to evaluate how they differ between prodrugs and drugs and the predictive accuracy of the software. Results70 prodrug-drug pairs were found and selected for the study. The mean predicted fa,passive and fdiss for the prodrugs were 0.74 and 0.94, respectively. Corresponding estimates for the drugs were 0.72 and 0.98, respectively. For non-hydrolyzed prodrugs, the median relative and absolute prediction errors for fa were 1.17-fold and 0.08, respectively. Corresponding values for drugs were 1.11-fold and 0.07, respectively. The correlation between predicted and observed fa for non-hydrolyzed ester prodrugs and drugs combined (predictive accuracy) was 0.6. ConclusionProdrugs and drugs had similar average predicted fa,passive and fdiss, and most had or were predicted to have at least 50 % fa. The fa for about 1/3 of non-hydrolyzed prodrugs was higher than for corresponding drugs, showing successful prodrug design. Adequate prediction accuracy validates ANDROMEDA for prediction of prodrug and drug absorption in man.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
5
Archives of Toxicology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.4%
7
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
9
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
10
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
20
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%