Moving from theory to practice: exploring power and power sharing in participatory health research partnerships: a scoping review protocol
Burduladze, N.; Salsberg, J.; Jones, L. P.; Jones, B. D.; Msowoya, U.; Whitney, A.; Gilfoyle, M.
Show abstract
IntroductionParticipatory health research (PHR) as a research paradigm, guides the research process and strives to achieve positive change in society in the interest of peoples health. In this scoping review, PHR will be used as an umbrella term considering a wide range of collaborative research approaches in the health context. PHR is conducted with or by those it intends to benefit, as opposed to on and for them. Their involvement throughout the research process seeks to shift power and decision-making from where they traditionally lay within academia toward community, patient and public end-users. Research cannot be truly participatory without concurrently addressing power dynamics within the partnership and power imbalances in decision making. Therefore, power sharing can be defined as a major factor in building effective academic-community collaborations. This scoping review aims to identify, clarify, and map existing literature on power and power sharing in PHR from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Specifically, we will explore how is power conceptualised throughout the literature, and how power and power sharing are applied and addressed in real-life PHR partnerships. Materials and methodsThis scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers Manual. This scoping review will consider both empirical and non-empirical research that report on understanding power and power sharing in participatory health research partnerships. All appropriate studies will be retrieved from the following five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, SocIndex. This review will be limited to articles published in English and from January 1998 to April 2022. As the scoping review aims to capture more than peer-reviewed and published literature, it will also include grey literature such as theses and dissertations, reports, conference proceedings, and editorials. Data from the included literature will be extracted based on the data extraction tool, defined in advance. Ethics and disseminationAs primary data will not be collected, ethical approval is not required to conduct the scoping review. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 95%
- Artificial Intelligence for Contextual Well-being: Protocol for an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study with Medical Students as a Social Microcosm 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 96%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 96%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 94%
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 93%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 93%
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 92%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.