Subtle Structural Translation Remarkably Modulates the Super-Resolution Imaging of Self-blinking Rhodamines
Zheng, Y.; Ye, Z.; Xiao, Y.
Show abstract
The evolution of super-resolution imaging techniques is benefited from the ongoing competition for optimal rhodamine fluorophores. Yet, it seems blinded to select the best one among different rhodamine derivatives for specific labeling and imaging, without the knowledge on imaging impact of even the minimum structural transform. Herein, we have designed a pair of self-blinking sulforhodamines (STMR, SRhB) with the bare distinction of methyl or ethyl substituents, and engineered them with Halo protein ligands. Although the two present similar spectral properties ({lambda}ab, {lambda}fl, {square}, etc.), they demonstrated unique single-molecule characteristics preferring to individual imaging applications. Experimentally, STMR with high emissive rates was qualified for imaging structures with rapid dynamics (endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria), and SRhB with prolonged on-times and photostability was suited for relatively "static" nuclei and microtubules. Utilized this new knowledge, the mitochondrial morphology during apoptosis and ferroptosis was first super-resolved by STMR. Our study highlights the significance of even the smallest structural modification to the modulation of super-resolution imaging performance, and would provide insight for future fluorophore design.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ether Rhodamines with Enhanced Hydrophilicity, Fluorogenicity, and Brightness for Super-Resolution Imaging 97%
- Red Light Mediated Photo-Conversion of Silicon Rhodamines to Oxygen Rhodamines for Single-Molecule Microscopy 96%
- Low-Background Cancer Imaging With a Bioorthogonal Fluorescence Probe and Engineered Reporter Enzyme Bearing a Targeting Moiety 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.