Further development and feasibility randomised controlled trial of a digital programme for adolescent depression, MoodHwb: study protocol
Bevan Jones, R.; Merry, S.; Stallard, P.; Randell, E.; Weavers, B.; Gray, A.; Hindle, E.; Gavigan, M.; Clarkstone, S.; Williams-Thomas, R.; Poile, V.; Playle, R.; Bisson, J.; McNamara, R.; Rice, F.; Simpson, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionA digital programme, MoodHwb, was co-designed with young people experiencing or at high risk of depression, parents/carers, and professionals, to provide support for young people with their mood and wellbeing. A preliminary evaluation study provided support for the programme theory and found that MoodHwb was acceptable to use. The present study aims to refine the programme based on user feedback, and to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the updated version and study methods. Methods and analysisInitially, this study will refine MoodHwb with the involvement of young people, including in a pre-trial acceptability phase. This will be followed by a multi-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing MoodHwb plus usual care with a digital information pack plus usual care. Up to 120 young people aged 13-19 years with symptoms of depression and their parents/carers will be recruited through schools, primary mental health services, youth services, charities, and voluntary self-referral in Wales and Scotland. The primary outcomes are the feasibility and acceptability of the MoodHwb programme (including usage, design, and content) and of trial methods (including recruitment and retention rates), assessed two months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes include potential impact on domains including depression knowledge and stigma, help-seeking, wellbeing and depression and anxiety symptoms measured at two months post-randomisation. Ethics and disseminationThe pre-trial acceptability phase was approved by the Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (REC) and the University of Glasgow College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences REC. The trial was approved by Wales NHS REC 3 (21/WA/0205), the Health Research Authority (HRA), Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW), university health board R&D departments in Wales, and schools in Wales and Scotland. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed open-access journals, at conferences and meetings, and online to academic, clinical, and educational audiences and the wider public. Trial registration numberISRCTN12437531. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIMoodHwb was co-designed with young people with lived experience or at high risk of depression, parents/carers, and practitioners. C_LIO_LIMoodHwb is bilingual, personalised according to user needs and preferences, and has been developed in line with evidence-based approaches to support young people with depressive symptoms and their parents/carers, friends, and practitioners. C_LIO_LIMultiple methods will be used to collect data in a range of settings for the trial, including validated questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, a focus group, and Web/app usage monitoring. C_LIO_LIAs this is a feasibility study, we will not be able to determine the effectiveness of MoodHwb; however, the findings will inform the design of a definitive effectiveness trial. C_LIO_LIParticipants will not be blind to treatment allocation as this is not possible with an intervention of this kind. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 98%
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 95%
- Common Practices for Sociodemographic Data Reporting in Digital Mental Health Intervention Research: A Scoping Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trialling an Optimised social Groups intervention in services to Enhance social connecTedness and mental Health in vulnERable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial 97%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 96%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 95%
- Transdiagnostic phenotyping of psychopathology in a help-seeking population (PhenoNetz) - a study protocol for an experience sampling study 92%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 95%
- Process Evaluation of APPLE-Tree (Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle bEhaviour Change and Technology to build REsiliEnce), a Dementia-Prevention Study focused on Health and Lifestyle changes 94%
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 94%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.