Back

Hormone Exposure And Venous Thromboembolism In Commercially-Insured Women 50 To 64 Years Of Age

Weller, S. c.; Davis, J. W.; Porterfield, L.; Chen, L.; Wilkinson, G.

2022-11-20 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2022.11.19.22282547
Show abstract

ObjectiveDetermine whether hormone-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk varies by exposure route and formulation in 50-64 year-old US women. DesignNested case-control study. SettingLarge US commercially-insured population with patient-level claims data. ParticipantsWomen aged 50-64 years with at least one year of enrollment. Controls were matched to incident cases (10:1) on VTE date and cases age (+/- 2yrs). Exclusions included prior VTE, intravascular vena cava (IVC) filter within twelve months, and anticoagulant exposure within 14 days. ExposuresAll estrogen and progestogen prescriptions (with route and formulation) filled within 12 months prior to index date were coded as current (0-60 days), past (61-365 days), or none. Contraceptives were categorized separately. OutcomeAcute VTE cases were identified with ICD codes plus anticoagulant, IVC filter, or death within 30 days. ResultsConditional logic regression analyses controlled for differences between cases (n=20,359) and controls (n=203,590) in Elixhauser comorbidities and VTE risk factors. Odds ratios (OR) were as follows: for current oral, unopposed estradiol 1.24 (95% CI: 1.09 to 1.40) or conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) 1.46 (95% CI: 1.28 to 1.68); for progestogens with estradiol 1.14 (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.37), with CEE 1.52 (95% CI: 1.25 to 1.84), or with ethinyl estradiol 2.35 (95% CI: 1.71 to 3.25). Current transdermal estradiol had the lowest ORs, whether unopposed, 0.70 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.83) or combined with progestogens, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.96), but varied by progestogen. The OR for estrogen-progestogen contraceptives was 5.22 (95% CI: 4.67 to 5.84) compared to no exposure and 4.24 (95% CI: 3.64 to 4.98) compared to combined MHT. ConclusionsIn 50-64-year-old women, transdermal menopausal hormone therapy (estradiol with or without progestogens) did not elevate VTE risk. In contrast, contraceptives markedly increased VTE risk. Summary Boxes What is already known on this topic?O_LIRandomized controlled trials indicate that relative risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately twice as high with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) containing conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate compared to no hormone exposure. C_LIO_LIRecent large, observational studies in the UK and Europe suggest that estradiol is lower risk than CEE and transdermal estradiol does not raise VTE risk compared to no hormone exposure, but results may not generalize to the United States because of differences in formulary, prescribing patterns, and background VTE incidence. C_LI What this study addsO_LIUsing a large medical record database for US commercially-insured women 50-64 years of age, results confirmed that VTE risk was higher for oral compared to transdermal MHT and transdermal MHT (unopposed estrogen or combined with a progestogen) did not increase risk for VTE compared to no hormone exposure. However, unique US prescribing patterns included MHT with transdermal estradiol plus oral progestogens and MHT with ethinyl estradiol. C_LIO_LIMHT estrogen formulation affected VTE risk: ethinyl estradiol had higher risk than CEE, and CEE had higher risk than estradiol. C_LIO_LICombined hormonal contraceptives (oral, vaginal, transdermal) had a markedly higher increase in VTE compared to MHT. C_LI

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 20%
1.5× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 6%
3.9× avg
3
Sexually Transmitted Infections
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 0.3%
61× avg
4
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 2%
8.1× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 37%
5.0%
6
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 2%
9.4× avg
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
American Society for Clinical Investigation · based on 50 published papers
Top 0.5%
21× avg
8
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 6%
3.5× avg
9
Preventive Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
49× avg
10
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
42× avg
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 65 published papers
Top 4%
5.2× avg
12
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.7%
23× avg
13
Human Reproduction
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 110 published papers
Top 10%
3.1× avg
15
SSM - Population Health
Elsevier BV · based on 17 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
16
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 16%
1.7× avg
17
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
Fortune Journals · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
18
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.9%
20× avg
19
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 5%
3.6× avg
20
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
7.1× avg
21
European Journal of Human Genetics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 25 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
22
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 23%
0.7%
23
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
5.9× avg
24
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
9.0× avg
25
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 3%
8.6× avg