An Automatized Workflow to Study Mechanistic Indicators for Driver Gene Prediction with Moonlight
Saksager, A.; Nourbakhsh, M.; Tom, N.; Chen, X. S.; Colaprico, A.; Olsen, C.; Tiberti, M.; Papaleo, E.
Show abstract
Prediction of tumor suppressors and oncogenes, also called driver genes, is an essential step in understanding cancer development and discovering potential novel treatments. We recently proposed Moonlight as a bioinformatics framework to predict driver genes and analyze them in a system-biology-oriented manner based on -omics integration. Moonlight uses gene expression as a primary data source and combines it with patterns related to cancer hallmarks and regulatory networks to identify oncogenic mediators. Once the oncogenic mediators are identified, it is important to include extra levels of evidence, called mechanistic indicators, to identify driver genes and to link the observed changes in gene expression to the underlying alteration that promotes them. Such a mechanistic indicator could be for example a mutation in the regulatory regions for the candidate gene or mutations in the regulator itself. In this work, we developed new functionalities and release Moonlight2, to provide the user with the mutation-based mechanistic indicator to streamline the analyses of this second layer of evidence. The function analyzes mutation information in a cancer cohort to classify them into driver and passenger mutations. Moreover, the function estimates the potential effect of a mutation on the transcriptional, translational, or protein structure/function level. Those oncogenic mediators with at least one driver mutation are retained as the final set of driver genes. We applied Moonlight2 and the newly developed function to a case study on Basal-like breast cancer subtype using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We found six oncogenes (SF3B4, EBNA1BP2, KRTCAP2, ZBTB8OS, RUNX2, and POLR2J) and ten tumor suppressor genes (KIF26B, NR5A2, ARHGAP25, EMCN, ARL15, PCOLCE, TPK1, TEK, KIR2DL4, and GMFG) containing a driver mutation in their promoter region, possibly explaining their deregulation. The Moonlight2R source code is available at https://github.com/ELELAB/Moonlight2R.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Crinet: A computational tool to infer genome-wide competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) interactions 94%
- Novel candidates of pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a 3,552 Japanese whole-genome sequence dataset (3.5KJPNv2) 94%
- MFmap: A semi-supervised generative model matching cell lines to tumours and cancer subtypes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep neural network approach to predicting clinical outcomes of neuroblastoma patients 93%
- neoANT-HILL: an integrated tool for identification of potential neoantigens 92%
- DeepTRIAGE: Interpretable and Individualised BiomarkerScores using Attention Mechanism for the Classification of Breast Cancer Sub-types 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- driveR: A Novel Method for Prioritizing Cancer Driver Genes Using Somatic Genomics Data 96%
- pyCancerSig: subclassifying human cancer with comprehensive single nucleotide, structural and microsatellite mutational signature deconstruction from whole genome sequencing 96%
- Ranking Cancer Drivers via Betweenness-based Outlier Detection and Random Walks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 97%
- Uncovering Hidden Cancer Self-Dependencies through Analysis of shRNA-Level Dependency Scores 95%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.