Long-term temporal trends in incidence rate and case fatality of sepsis and COVID-19-related sepsis: nationwide registry study
Skei, N. V.; Nilsen, T. I.; Knoop, S. T.; Prescott, H.; Lydersen, S.; Mohus, R. M.; Brkic, A.; Liyanarachi, K. V.; Solligaard, E.; Damaas, J. K.; Gustad, L. T.
Show abstract
ImportanceSepsis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. The majority of sepsis cases is attributed to bacterial infections, but virus infections can also induce sepsis. Conflicting results in incidence rates and case fatality trends of sepsis is reported, and how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced these trends are unknown. ObjectiveTo estimate temporal trends in incidence rate and case fatality during a 14-year period from 2008 through 2021, and to assess possible shifts in these trends during the COVID-19 pandemic. DesignA nationwide longitudinal registry study using ICD-10 discharge codes to identify sepsis. SettingAll Norwegian hospitals from 2008 through 2021. ParticipantsAll sepsis cases included 317.705 patients and of these, 222.832 had a first sepsis episode. Main outcomes and measuresAnnual age-standardized incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Poisson regression was used to estimate changes in incidence rates across time, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for in-hospital death. ResultsAmong 12.619.803 adult hospitalizations, 317.705 (2.5%) patients met the sepsis criteria and 222.832 (70.0%) had a first sepsis episode. In the period 2009-2019, the annual incidence rate for a first sepsis episode was stable (incidence rate ratio per year, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.994-1.004), whereas for all sepsis the incidence rate increased by 15.5% during the period (annual incidence rate ratio, 1.013; 95% CI 1.007-1.019). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence rate ratio for a first sepsis was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.829-0.927) in 2020 and 0.929 (95% CI, 0.870-0.992) in 2021, and for all sepsis it was 0.870 (95% CI, 0.810-0.935) in 2020 and 0.908 (95% CI, 0.840-0.980) in 2021, compared to the previous 11-year period. In-hospital deaths declined in the period 2009-2019 (odds ratio per year, 0.954 [95% CI,0.950-0.958]), whereas deaths increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (odds ratios, 1.061 [95% CI 1.001-1.124] and in 2021 odds ratio (1.164 [95% CI, 1.098-1.233]). Conclusion and relevanceWe found a stable incidence rate of a first sepsis episode during the years 2009-2019. However, the increasing burden of all sepsis admissions indicates that sepsis awareness with updated guidelines and education must continue. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHas there been a change in incidence rate and case fatality of sepsis over the past decade, and how did the COVID-19 pandemic influence sepsis incidence rates and in-hospital mortality? FindingsIn this nationwide longitudinal registry study the incidence rate of all sepsis episodes increased and the incidence rate of a first sepsis episode was stable during the period 2009-2019, whereas in 2020 and 2021, the incidence rate of a first and all sepsis episodes was lower than in the preceding 11-year period. Case fatality risk declined from 2009 to 2019, but increased somewhat in 2020 and 2021, when 9.7% of first sepsis cases were identified as COVID-19 related sepsis. MeaningDespite a stable incidence rate of first-time sepsis admissions over time, the burden of sepsis is rising due to an increased rate of patients admitted multiple times with sepsis. The COVID-19 pandemic have had an impact on sepsis incidence rate and hospital mortality and needs further evaluation.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 92%
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 91%
- Risk factors for severity on admission and the disease progression during hospitalization in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients in Japan 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 95%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 92%
- Development and performance of a population-based risk stratification model for COVID-19 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of the Sepsis-3 criteria to describe sepsis epidemiology in the AmsterdamUMCdb intensive care dataset 95%
- Clustering ICU patients with sepsis based on the patterns of their circulating biomarkers: a secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study 93%
- Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (NeoMero1): a randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: cohort study in OpenSAFELY using linked primary care, secondary care and death registration data 90%
- Outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalised immunocompromised patients: an analysis of the WHO ISARIC CCP-UK prospective cohort study 89%
- Long-term outcomes of hospitalized SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 patients with and without neurological involvement: 3-year follow-up assessment 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical prediction models to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review 93%
- The hospital burden of critical illness across global settings: a point-prevalence and cohort study in Malawi, Sri Lanka and Sweden 91%
- Essential Emergency and Critical Care – a consensus among global clinical experts 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.