An Empirical Study of ML-based Phenotyping and Denoising for Improved Genomic Discovery
Yuan, B.; McLean, C.; Hormozdiari, F. I.; Cosentino, J.
Show abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are used to identify genetic variants significantly correlated with a target disease or phenotype as a first step to detect potentially causal genes. The availability of high-dimensional biomedical data in population-scale biobanks has enabled novel machine-learning-based phenotyping approaches in which machine learning (ML) algorithms rapidly and accurately phenotype large cohorts with both genomic and clinical data, increasing the statistical power to detect variants associated with a given phenotype. While recent work has demonstrated that these methods can be extended to diseases for which only low quality medical-record-based labels are available, it is not possible to quantify changes in statistical power since the underlying ground-truth liability scores for the complex, polygenic diseases represented by these medical-record-based phenotypes is unknown. In this work, we aim to empirically study the robustness of ML-based phenotyping procedures to label noise by applying varying levels of random noise to vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR), a quantitative feature of the optic nerve that is predictable from color fundus imagery and strongly influences glaucoma referral risk. We show that the ML-based phenotyping procedure recovers the underlying liability score across noise levels, significantly improving genetic discovery and PRS predictive power relative to noisy equivalents. Furthermore, initial denoising experiments show promising preliminary results, suggesting that improving such methods will yield additional gains.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving polygenic prediction from summary data by learning patterns of effect sharing across multiple phenotypes. 95%
- Joint Modeling of Effect Sizes for Two Correlated Traits: Characterizing Trait Properties to Enhance Polygenic Risk Prediction 95%
- Robust Inference of Bi-Directional Causal Relationships in Presence of Correlated Pleiotropy with GWAS Summary Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sparse Multitask group Lasso for Genome-Wide Association Studies 94%
- Association Tests Using Copy Number Profile Curves (CONCUR) Enhances Power in Rare Copy Number Variant Analysis 94%
- Biological networks and GWAS: comparing and combining network methods to understand the genetics of familial breast cancer susceptibility in the GENESIS study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.