Frameworks for measuring population health: a scoping review
Chan, S. L.; Ho, C. Z. H.; Khaing, N. E. E.; Ho, E.; Pong, C.; Chua, C.; Li, Z.; Lim, T.; Lam, S. S. W.; Low, L. L.; How, C. H.
Show abstract
IntroductionMany regions in the world are using the population health approach and require a means to measure the health of their population of interest. Population health frameworks provide a theoretical grounding for conceptualization of population health and therefore a logical basis for selection of indicators. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview and summary of the characteristics of existing population health frameworks that have been used to conceptualize the measurement of population health. MethodsWe used the Population, Concept and Context (PCC) framework to define eligibility criteria of frameworks. We were interested in frameworks applicable for general populations, that contained components of measurement of health with or without its antecedents and applied at the population level or used a population health approach. Eligible reports of eligible frameworks should include at least domains and subdomains, purpose, or indicators. We searched 5 databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, NYAM Grey Literature Report, and OpenGrey), governmental and organizational sites on Google and websites of selected organizations using keywords from the PCC framework. Characteristics of the frameworks were summarized descriptively and narratively. ResultsForty-eight frameworks were included. The majority originated from the US (42%), Canada (23%) and Europe (23%). Apart from 1 framework developed for rural populations and 2 for indigenous populations, the rest were for general urban populations. The numbers of domains, subdomains and indicators were highly variable. Health status and social determinants of health were the most common domains across all frameworks. Different frameworks had different priorities and therefore focus on different domains. ConclusionKey domains common across frameworks other than health status were social determinants of health, health behaviours and healthcare system performance. The results in this review serve as a useful resource for governments and healthcare organizations for informing their population health measurement efforts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 94%
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Global Learning Opportunities Within Social Innovation in Health (GLOWS): Modified Delphi Process to Identify and Pilot Core Competencies for Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
- Health System Resilience-enhancing Strategies for Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): Success and Challenges A Systematic Review Protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 95%
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 94%
- Measuring progress on health and well-being in the Eastern Mediterranean Region via voluntary national reviews, 2016 - 2021: what does the data reveal? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 92%
- Understanding care-seeking of pregnant women from underserved groups: A systematic review and meta-ethnography 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 94%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.