Back

Examining Anxiety and Risk-taking in Healthy Male and Female Wistar Rats using Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Elevated Plus Maze

Sharma, S.; Pandey, J.; Jain, S.; Singh, V.

2022-11-17 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2022.11.16.516842 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) offers a standard set up for understanding anxiety, unconditioned risk-avoidance in rodents. The animal shows a preference for enclosed safe arms and avoids risky, open arms that evoke anxiety due to elevated platform (unconditioned response to elevation). A few rodent studies aiming to understand sex-skewed representation in anxiety disorders use the maze and report that more females compared to males show high levels of anxiety and risk-avoidance on an elevated platform. Ethograms derived from examining animal behaviour in the EPM provide precise measures of behaviour of interest, enabling objective assessment of anxiety and risk behaviour. We report two new parameters that might be critical for quantitative analysis of EPM task as a measure of anxiety with reference to sex-differences in risk-taking: (a) spatial preference for arms (open & closed) (b) temporal shift in arm preference in task trials. We first report results from the conventionally derived measures confirming that males spent more time in the open arms indicating low anxiety and higher risk-taking. Preferences for the two open and two closed arms were non-uniform for males and females; male showed stronger preference for one of the two risky open arms, and females showed a stronger preference for one of the two safe closed arms. Temporal analyses indicated that males spent more time in open arms in 3 out of 6 time bins (time blocks), and females spent more time in the closed arms in 5 out of 6 time bins (time blocks), however, counter-intuitively, females showed larger increase in time spent in open arms in the last phase potentially indicating greater regulation of anxiety and increased risk-taking. Inclusion of spatial and temporal parameters in EPM studies might improve our understanding of cognitive and biological sex-differences pertaining to anxiety, and risky behaviour.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
8
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
11
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
13
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
16
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%