Back

Explainable Deep Generative Models, Ancestral Fragments, and Murky Regions of the Protein Structure Universe

Draizen, E. J.; Mura, C.; Bourne, P. E.

2022-11-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.11.16.516787 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Modern proteins did not arise abruptly, as singular events, but rather over the course of at least 3.5 billion years of evolution. Can machine learning teach us how this occurred? The molecular evolutionary processes that yielded the intricate three-dimensional (3D) structures of proteins involve duplication, recombination and mutation of genetic elements, corresponding to short peptide fragments. Identifying and elucidating these ancestral fragments is crucial to deciphering the interrelationships amongst proteins, as well as how evolution acts upon protein sequences, structures & functions. Traditionally, structural fragments have been found using sequence-based and 3D structural alignment approaches, but that becomes challenging when proteins have undergone extensive permutations--allowing two proteins to share a common architecture, though their topologies may drastically differ (a phenomenon termed the Urfold). We have designed a new framework to identify compact, potentially-discontinuous peptide fragments by combining (i) deep generative models of protein superfamilies with (ii) layerwise relevance propagation (LRP) to identify atoms of great relevance in creating an embedding during an allsuperfamilies x alldomains analysis. Our approach recapitulates known relationships amongst the evolutionarily ancient small {beta}-barrels (e.g. SH3 and OB folds) and amongst P-loop-containing proteins (e.g. Rossmann and P-loop NTPases), previously established via manual analysis. Because of the generality of our deep models approach, we anticipate that it can enable the discovery of new ancestral peptides. In a sense, our framework uses LRP as an explainable AI approach, in conjunction with a recent deep generative model of protein structure (termed DeepUrfold), in order to leverage decades worth of structural biology knowledge to decipher the underlying molecular bases for protein structural relationships--including those which are exceedingly remote, yet discoverable via deep learning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.