The CANDID Study: impact of COVID-19 on critical care nurses and organisational outcomes: implications for the delivery of critical care services. A questionnaire study before and during the pandemic.
McCallum, L.; Rattray, J.; Pollard, B.; Millar, J.; Hull, A.; Ramsay, P.; Salisbury, L.; Scott, T.; Cole, S.; Dixon, D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo use a model of occupational stress to quantify and explain the impact of working in critical care during the Covid-19 pandemic on critical care nurses and organisational outcomes. ParticipantsCritical care nurses (CCNs) who worked in the UK NHS between January to November 2021 (n=461). MethodsA self-reported survey measured the components of the Job-Demand Reward model of occupational stress. Job-demands, job-resources, health impairment (mental health (GHQ-12), burnout (MBI), PTSD symptoms (PCL-5)), work engagement and six organisational outcomes (commitment, job satisfaction, changing jobs, certainty about the future, quality of care, patient safety) were measured. Data were compared to baseline data (n=557) collected between April to October 2018. Regression analyses identified predictors of health impairment, work engagement and organisational outcomes. FindingsCompared to 2018, CCNs were at elevated risk of probable psychological distress (GHQ-12, OR 6.03 [95% C.I. 4.75 to 7.95]; burnout emotional exhaustion, OR 4.02 [3.07 to 5.26]; burnout depersonalisation, OR 3.18 [1.99 to 5.07]; burnout accomplishment, OR 1.53 [1.18 to 1.97]). A third of CCNs reported probable PTSD. Job demands predicted psychological distress and job demands increased during the pandemic. Resources reduced the negative impact of job demands on psychological distress, but this moderating effect of resources was not observed at higher levels of demand. CCNs were less engaged in their work. Job and personal resources predicted work engagement and were reduced during the pandemic. All six organisational outcomes were impaired. Lack of resources, especially reduced learning opportunities, lack of focus on staff wellbeing, and reduced focus on quality predicted worse organisational outcomes. ConclusionsThe NHS needs to prioritise the welfare of CCNs, implement workplace change/planning, and support them to recover from the pandemic. The NHS is struggling to retain CCNs and, unless staff welfare is improved, quality of care and patient safety will likely decline.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic inequalities among NHS staff in England - workplace experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- Inequalities in NHS Staff Support among those from Ethnic Minority and Migrant groups during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 96%
- The psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on 4,378 UK healthcare workers and ancillary staff: initial baseline data from a cohort study collected during the first wave of the pandemic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 96%
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 95%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 94%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 95%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of UK healthcare workers 95%
- Secondary Stressors And Their Psychosocial Impacts On Healthcare Staff: Lessons From A Qualitative Systematic Review From The COVID-19 Pandemic In The UK 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 94%
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 93%
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.