Back

The CANDID Study: impact of COVID-19 on critical care nurses and organisational outcomes: implications for the delivery of critical care services. A questionnaire study before and during the pandemic.

McCallum, L.; Rattray, J.; Pollard, B.; Millar, J.; Hull, A.; Ramsay, P.; Salisbury, L.; Scott, T.; Cole, S.; Dixon, D.

2022-11-18 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2022.11.16.22282346 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo use a model of occupational stress to quantify and explain the impact of working in critical care during the Covid-19 pandemic on critical care nurses and organisational outcomes. ParticipantsCritical care nurses (CCNs) who worked in the UK NHS between January to November 2021 (n=461). MethodsA self-reported survey measured the components of the Job-Demand Reward model of occupational stress. Job-demands, job-resources, health impairment (mental health (GHQ-12), burnout (MBI), PTSD symptoms (PCL-5)), work engagement and six organisational outcomes (commitment, job satisfaction, changing jobs, certainty about the future, quality of care, patient safety) were measured. Data were compared to baseline data (n=557) collected between April to October 2018. Regression analyses identified predictors of health impairment, work engagement and organisational outcomes. FindingsCompared to 2018, CCNs were at elevated risk of probable psychological distress (GHQ-12, OR 6.03 [95% C.I. 4.75 to 7.95]; burnout emotional exhaustion, OR 4.02 [3.07 to 5.26]; burnout depersonalisation, OR 3.18 [1.99 to 5.07]; burnout accomplishment, OR 1.53 [1.18 to 1.97]). A third of CCNs reported probable PTSD. Job demands predicted psychological distress and job demands increased during the pandemic. Resources reduced the negative impact of job demands on psychological distress, but this moderating effect of resources was not observed at higher levels of demand. CCNs were less engaged in their work. Job and personal resources predicted work engagement and were reduced during the pandemic. All six organisational outcomes were impaired. Lack of resources, especially reduced learning opportunities, lack of focus on staff wellbeing, and reduced focus on quality predicted worse organisational outcomes. ConclusionsThe NHS needs to prioritise the welfare of CCNs, implement workplace change/planning, and support them to recover from the pandemic. The NHS is struggling to retain CCNs and, unless staff welfare is improved, quality of care and patient safety will likely decline.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
20.0%
2
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
9
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%