Ethical reporting of research on violence against women and children during COVID-19: Analysis of 75 studies and recommendations for future guidelines
Peterman, A.; Devries, K.; Guedes, A.; Chandan, J. S.; Minhas, S.; Lim, R. Q. H.; Gennari, F.; Bhatia, A.
Show abstract
Changes in research practice during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitates renewed attention to ethical protocols and reporting for data collection on sensitive topics. We systematically searched journal publications from the start of the pandemic to November 2021, identifying 75 studies that collected primary data on violence against women and children. We assess the transparency of ethics reporting and adherence to relevant guidelines against a 14-item checklist of best practices. Studies reported adhering to best practices on 31% of scored items with highest reporting for ethical clearance (87%) and informed consent/assent (84/83%) and lowest reporting for facilitating referrals for minors and soliciting participant feedback (both 0%). Violence studies of primary data collected during COVID-19 report on few ethical standards, obscuring stakeholder ability to enforce a do no harm approach and to assess the reliability of findings. We offer recommendations and guidelines to improve future reporting and implementation of ethics within violence studies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions in sexual and reproductive health services addressing violence against women in low- and middle- income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review 95%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 93%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How effective are UK-based support interventions and services targeted at adults who have experienced domestic and sexual violence and abuse at improving their safety and wellbeing? A systematic review protocol 95%
- Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis 94%
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 92%
- Effects of a multimedia campaign on HIV self-testing and PrEP outcomes among young people in South Africa: A mixed-methods impact evaluation of ‘MTV Shuga Down South’ 92%
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 94%
- Suicide and self-harm in low- and middle- income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review 93%
- Is addressing violence against women prioritised in health policies? Findings from a WHO Policies Database 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.