Organ Finder a new AI-based organ segmentation tool for CT
Edenbrandt, L.; Enqvist, O.; Larsson, M.; Ulen, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundAutomated organ segmentation in computed tomography (CT) is a vital component in many artificial intelligence-based tools in medical imaging. This study presents a new organ segmentation tool called Organ Finder 2.0. In contrast to most existing methods, Organ Finder was trained and evaluated on a rich multi-origin dataset with both contrast and non-contrast studies from different vendors and patient populations. ApproachA total of 1,171 CT studies from seven different publicly available CT databases were retrospectively included. Twenty CT studies were used as test set and the remaining 1,151 were used to train a convolutional neural network. Twenty-two different organs were studied. Professional annotators segmented a total of 5,826 organs and segmentation quality was assured manually for each of these organs. ResultsOrgan Finder showed high agreement with manual segmentations in the test set. The average Dice index over all organs was 0.93 and the same high performance was found for four different subgroups of the test set based on the presence or absence of intravenous and oral contrast. ConclusionsAn AI-based tool can be used to accurately segment organs in both contrast and non-contrast CT studies. The results indicate that a large training set and high-quality manual segmentations should be used to handle common variations in the appearance of clinical CT studies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 97%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 96%
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low dose quantitative spectral imaging 96%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 94%
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 96%
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 94%
- Effective Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting COVID-19 Outcomes from Chest Computed Tomography Volumes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm 96%
- Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of swallowing and chewing structures 96%
- Reproducible spectral CT thermometry with liver-mimicking phantoms for image-guided thermal ablation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coronary artery calcium mass measurement based on integrated intensity and volume fraction techniques 95%
- “E Pluribus Unum”: Prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) Crowdsourced Initiative for Multi-Observer Segmentation 94%
- A 3D CNN Classification Model for Accurate Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 using Computed Tomography Images 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.