COVID Seq as Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern (VOC)
Carpenter, R. E.; Tamrakar, V. K.; Brown, E.; Almas, S.; Sharma, R.
Show abstract
Rapid classification and detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants have been critical in comprehending the viruss transmission dynamics. Clinical manifestation of the infection is influenced by comorbidities such as age, immune status, diabetes, and the infecting variant. Thus, clinical management may differ for new variants. For example, some monoclonal antibody treatments are variant-specific. Yet, an FDA-approved test for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 variant is unavailable. A laboratory-developed test (LDT) remains a viable option for reporting the infecting variant for clinical intervention or epidemiological purposes. Accordingly, we have validated the Illumina COVID-Seq assay as an LDT according to the guidelines prescribed by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). The limit of detection (LOD) of this test is Ct<30 ([~]15 viral copies) and >200X genomic coverage, and the test is 100% specific in the detection of existing variants. The test demonstrated 100% precision in inter-day, intra-day, and intra-laboratory reproducibility studies. It is also 100% accurate, defined by reference strain testing and split sample testing with other CLIA laboratories. Advanta Genetics LDT COVID Seq has been reviewed by CAP inspectors and is under review by FDA for Emergency Use Authorization.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparative study of real-time RT-PCR based SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and its application to human derived and surface swabbed material 96%
- Two Stage Hierarchical Group Testing Strategy to Increase SARS-CoV-2 Testing Capacity at an Institution of Higher Education: A Retrospective Analysis 96%
- Production and performance assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 biomimetic in a verification program for pandemic readiness 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 testing in the community: Testing positive samples with the TaqMan SARS-CoV-2 Mutation Panel to find variants in real-time 96%
- Performance of COVIDSeq and Swift normalase amplicon SARS-CoV-2 panels for SARS-CoV-2 Genomes Sequencing: Practical Guide and Combining FASTQ Strategy 96%
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.