Back

GlyLES: Grammar-based Parsing of Glycans from IUPAC-condensed to SMILES

Joeres, R.; Bojar, D.; Kalinina, O. V.

2022-11-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.11.10.515921 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glycans are important polysaccharides on cellular surfaces that are bound to glycoproteins and glycolipids. These are one of the most common post-translational modifications of proteins in eukaryotic cells. They play important roles in protein folding, cell-cell interactions, and other extracellular processes. Changes in glycan structures may influence the course of different diseases, such as infections or cancer. Glycans are commonly represented using the IUPAC-condensed notation. IUPAC-condensed is a textual representation of the Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans (SNFG) that assigns a colored, geometrical shape to the main monosaccharides. These symbols are then connected in tree-like structures, visualizing the glycan structure on a polymeric level. Yet for a representation on the atomic level, notations such as SMILES should be used. To our knowledge, there is no easy-to-use, general, open-source, and offline tool to convert the IUPAC-condensed notation to SMILES. Here, we present the open-access Python package GlyLES for the generalizable generation of SMILES representations out of IUPAC-condensed representations. GlyLES uses a grammar to read in the monomer tree from the IUPAC-condensed notation. From this tree, the tool can compute atomic structures of each monomer based on their IUPAC-condensed descriptions. In the last step, it merges all monomers into the atomic structure of a glycan in the SMILES notation. GlyLES is the first package that allows conversion between IUPAC-condensed notations of glycans and SMILES strings. This may have multiple applications, including straightforward visualization, substructure search, molecular modelling and docking, and a new featurization strategy for machine-learning algorithms. GlyLES is available at https://github.com/kalininalab/GlyLES.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.