Back

Genebank genomics allows greatly improved taxonomic correction for Capsicum spp. accessions using a novel automated classification method

Rabanus-Wallace, M. T.; Stein, N.

2022-11-10 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.11.09.515845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To maximise the benefit of exploiting genebank resources, accurate and complete taxonomic assignments are imperative. The rise of genebank genomics allows genetic methods to be used for this task, but these need to be largely automated since the number of samples dealt with is too great for efficient manual recategorisation, but no clearly optimal method has yet arisen. A recent landmark genebank genomic study sequenced over 10,000 accessions of peppers (Capsicum spp.), for which the exploitation of genebank material is of huge commercial, cultural, and scientific importance. This study resulted in precisely the type of dataset that will, in coming decades, be likely be produced for hundreds of plant taxa. The long-appreciated difficulties of pepper taxonomy are evident from the many obvious misclassifications noted in this and other studies, providing a perfect opportunity to simultaneously advance methods development in the area, to correct many genebank taxonomic assignments of pepper accessions, and to provide insights into pepper taxonomy in general. This paper aims to achieve these goals using an approach that combines several ideas from standard classification algorithms to create a highly flexible and customisable classifier that performs favourably when compared with key alternative methods. The various characteristics of different methods are discussed, and possible sensible alterations to pepper taxonomy based on the results are proposed for discussion by the community.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
6
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
7
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
9
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
24
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
25
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%