Prioritizing interventions for cholera control in Kenya, 2015-2020
Boru, W.; Xiao, S.; Amoth, P.; Kareko, D.; Langat, D.; Were, I.; Ali, M.; Sack, D. A.; Lee, E. C.; Debes, A. K.
Show abstract
Kenya has experienced cholera outbreaks since 1971, with the most recent wave beginning in late 2014. Between 2015-2020, 32 of 47 counties reported 30,431 suspected cholera cases. The Global Task Force for Cholera Control (GTFCC) developed a Global Roadmap for Ending Cholera by 2030, which emphasizes the need to target multi-sectoral interventions to priority areas known as "cholera burden hotspots." This study utilizes the GTFCCs hotspot method to identify hotspots in Kenya at the county and sub-county administrative levels from 2015 through 2020. 32 of 47 (68.1%) counties reported cholera cases during this time while only 149 of 301 (49.5%) sub-counties reported cholera cases. The analysis identifies hotspots based on the mean annual incidence (MAI) over the past five-year period and choleras persistence in the area. Applying a MAI threshold of 90th percentile and the median persistence at both the county and sub-county levels, we identified 13 high risk sub-counties from 8 counties, including the 3 high risk counties of Garissa, Tana River and Wajir. This demonstrates that several sub-counties are high level hotspots while their counties are not. In addition, when cases reported by county versus sub-county hotspot risk are compared, 1.4 million people overlapped in the areas identified as both high-risk county and high-risk sub-county. However, assuming that finer scale data is more accurate, 1.6 million high risk sub-county people would have been misclassified as medium risk with a county-level analysis. Furthermore, an additional 1.6 million people would have been classified as living in high-risk in a county-level analysis when at the sub-county level, they were medium, low or no-risk sub-counties. This results in 3.2 million people being misclassified when county level analysis is utilized rather than a more-focused sub-county level analysis. This analysis highlights the need for more localized risk analyses to target cholera intervention and prevention efforts towards the populations most vulnerable.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the efficiency of scale-up and deployment of community health workers in Mali: a geospatial analysis 95%
- Monitoring COVID-19 Occurrence in a Resource-limited Setting - COVID-19 Sentinel Surveillance in Malawi 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in three Kenyan Health and Demographic Surveillance Sites, December 2020-May 2021 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographical and temporal variation in reduction of malaria infection among children under five years of age throughout Nigeria 94%
- Malaria trends in districts that were targeted and not-targeted for seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children under five years of age in Guinea, 2014 - 2021 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Domains of transmission and association of community, school, and household sanitation with soil-transmitted helminth infections among children in coastal Kenya 94%
- Estimating the burden of malaria and soil-transmitted helminth co-infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a geospatial study 94%
- Prevalence, intensity and risk factors of soil-transmitted helminthiasis after five effective rounds of preventive chemotherapy across three implementation units in Ondo State, Nigeria 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The importance of supplementary immunisation activities to prevent measles outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya 92%
- Estimating the cost-effectiveness of maternal vaccination and monoclonal antibodies for respiratory syncytial virus in Kenya and South Africa 91%
- Mpox severity and mortality in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.