Back

Comparisons of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Influenza: Population Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Adults

Begley, K. M.; Monto, A. S.; Lamerato, L. E.; Malani, A. N.; Lauring, A. S.; Talbot, H. K.; Gaglani, M.; McNeal, T.; Silveira, F. P.; Zimmerman, R. K.; Middleton, D. B.; Ghamande, S.; Murthy, K.; Kim, L.; Ferdinands, J. M.; Patel, M. M.; Martin, E. T.

2022-11-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.11.04.22281243 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is under-recognized in hospitalized adults. We evaluated severity of acute respiratory illness (ARI) including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mechanical ventilation in a national surveillance network. MethodsHospitalized adults who met a standardized ARI case definition were prospectively enrolled across three respiratory seasons from hospitals participating across all sites of the U.S. Hospitalized Adult Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (HAIVEN, 2016-2019). Multivariable logistic regression was used to test associations between lab-confirmed infection and characteristics and clinical outcomes. ResultsAmong 10,311 hospitalized adults, 6% tested positive for RSV (n=622), 18.8% positive for influenza (n=1,940), and 75.1% negative for RSV and influenza (n=7,749). The proportion of adults with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) was higher among adults with RSV than influenza (CHF: 37.3% vs. 28.8%, p<0.0001; COPD: 47.6% vs. 35.8%, p<0.0001). Patients with RSV had higher odds of experiencing length of stay [&ge;]8 days [OR=1.38 (95% CI: 1.06-1.80), p-value=0.02] and invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation [OR=1.45 (95% CI: 1.09-1.93), p-value=0.01] compared with influenza patients. ConclusionsOur findings suggest patients with RSV might incur worse outcomes than influenza in hospitalized adults, who are likely to have pre-existing cardiopulmonary conditions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.