Back

Exploring how ecological and epidemiological processes shape multi-host disease dynamics using global sensitivity analysis

Arachchilage, K. H.; Hussaini, M. Y.; Cogan, N. G.; Cortez, M.

2022-11-02 ecology
10.1101/2022.11.01.514725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We use global sensitivity analysis (specifically, Partial Rank Correlation Coefficients) to explore the roles of ecological and epidemiological processes in shaping the temporal dynamics of a parameterized SIR-type model of two host species and an environmentally transmitted pathogen. We compute the sensitivities of disease prevalence in each host species to model parameters. Sensitivity rankings and subsequent biological interpretations are calculated and contrasted for cases were the pathogen is introduced into a disease-free community and where a second host species is introduced into an endemic single-host community. In some cases the magnitudes and dynamics of the sensitivities can be predicted only by knowing the host species characteristics (i.e., their competitive abilities and disease competence) whereas in other cases they can be predicted by factors independent of the species characteristics (specifically, intraspecific versus interspecific processes or the species roles of invader versus resident). For example, when a pathogen is initially introduced into a disease-free community, disease prevalence in both hosts is more sensitive to the burst size of the first host than the second host. In comparison, disease prevalence in each host is more sensitive to its own infection rate than the infection rate of the other host species. In total, this study illustrates that global sensitivity analysis can provide useful insight into how ecological and epidemiological processes shape disease dynamics and how those effects vary across time and system conditions. Our results show that sensitivity analysis can provide quantification and direction when exploring biological hypotheses.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.9%
2
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
10
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
12
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
15
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
18
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%