Back

Propagation-based phase-contrast breast computed tomography: a visual grading assessment of the performance of photon-counting and flat-panel X-ray detectors

Giannotti, N.; Tavakoli Taba, S.; Gureyev, T.; Lewis, S.; Brombal, L.; Longo, R.; Donato, S.; Tromba, G.; Arana Pena, L.; Hausermann, D.; Hall, C.; Maksimenko, A.; Arhatari, B.; Nesterets, Y.; Brennan, P.

2022-11-01 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2022.11.01.22281633 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rationale and objectivesBreast cancer represents the leading cause of death from cancer in women worldwide. Early detection of breast tumours improves the prognosis and survival rate. Propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography (PB-CT) is a technique that uses refraction and absorption of the X-ray to produce images for clinical applications. This study compared the performance of photon-counting and flat-panel X-ray detectors in PB-CT breast imaging using synchrotron radiation. Materials and methodsMastectomy specimens underwent PB-CT imaging using the Hamamatsu C10900D Flat Panel and PIXIRAD-8 CdTe single-photon-counting detectors. PB-CT images generated at different imaging conditions were compared to absorption-based CT (AB-CT) reference images acquired with the same detectors to investigate the image quality improvement delivered by PB-CT relative to AB-CT. The image quality of the different image sets was assessed by eleven readers in a visual grading characteristics (VGC) study. ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient showed a moderate/good interobserver agreement for the image set analysed (ICC = 0.626, p = <0.001). The area under the curve showed that the image quality improvement in PB-CT images obtained by the PIXIRAD-8 CdTe single-photon-counting detector were consistently higher than the one for flat-panel Hamamatsu detector. The level of improvement in image quality was more substantial at lower radiation doses. ConclusionIn this study, the PIXIRAD-8 photon-counting detector was associated with higher image quality scores at all tested radiation dose levels, which was likely a result of the combined effect of the absence of dark current noise and better spatial resolution, compared to the flat-panel detector.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.2%
6
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
7
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
10
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
12
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
18
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.5%
24
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%