Back

Genome assembly of three Amazonian Morpho butterflyspecies reveals Z-chromosome rearrangements betweenclosely-related species living in sympatry

Bastide, H.; Lopez Villavicencio, M.; Ogereau, D.; Lledo, J.; Dutrillaux, A.-M.; Debat, V.; Llaurens, V.

2022-10-27 genomics
10.1101/2022.10.26.513852 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The genomic processes enabling speciation and the coexistence of species in sympatry are still largely unknown. Here we describe the whole genome sequencing and assembly of three closely-related species from the butterfly genus Morpho: Morpho achilles (Linnaeus, 1758), M. helenor (Cramer, 1776) and M. deidamia (Hubner, 1819). These large blue butterflies are emblematic species of the Amazonian rainforest. They live in sympatry in a wide range of their geographical distribution and display parallel diversification of dorsal wing colour pattern, suggesting local mimicry. By sequencing, assembling and annotating their genomes, we aim at uncovering pre-zygotic barriers preventing gene flow between these sympatric species. We found a genome size of 480 Mb for the three species and a chromosomal number ranging from 2n = 54 for M. deidamia to 2n = 56 for M. achilles and M. helenor. We also detected inversions on the sex chromosome Z that were differentially fixed between species, suggesting that chromosomal rearrangements may contribute to their reproductive isolation. The annotation of their genomes allowed us to recover in each species at least 12,000 protein-coding genes and to discover duplications of genes potentially involved in pre-zygotic isolation like genes controlling colour discrimination (L-opsin). Altogether, the assembly and the annotation of these three new reference genomes open new research avenues into the genomic architecture of speciation and reinforcement in sympatry, establishing Morpho butterflies as a new eco-evolutionary model.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.