Development and Validation of the Vanderbilt PRS-KS, an Instrument to Quantify Polygenic Risk Score Knowledge
Stubbs, D.; Hooker, G.; Le, Y.; Richter, L.; Bick, A.
Show abstract
PurposeAs polygenic risk scores (PRS) enter clinical practice, healthcare providers and the publics comprehension of PRS results are of great importance, yet poorly understood. We present the Vanderbilt Polygenic Risk Scores Knowledge Score (Vanderbilt PRS-KS), a tool to quantify PRS knowledge. MethodsThe Vanderbilt PRS-KS was developed by a team of genetic counselors and physicians to cover key conceptual facts pertaining to PRSs. We recruited (n=500) individuals with demographics representative of a U.S. sample and graduate-level healthcare students (n=74) at a large academic medical center to participate in this validation study. We evaluated the Vanderbilt PRS-KSs psychometric properties using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT). ResultsThe 7-item Vanderbilt PRS-KS correlated to a single latent construct on CFA ({Lambda}=0.31-0.61). The scale showed promising reliability (Cronbachs =0.66) with IRT summed scores of [≥]2 to [≤]5, demonstrating reliability > 0.70. The Vanderbilt PRS-KS significantly correlated with genetic knowledge and applied PRS knowledge (r=0.55, r=0.29), and graduate-level healthcare students had significantly higher scores compared to the representative sample (p<0.01). ConclusionsThe Vanderbilt PRS-KS is a rigorously validated measure to quantify PRS knowledge.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Influencing Precision Medicine Knowledge and Attitudes 94%
- The Role of Testing Availability on Intentions to Isolate during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Trial 93%
- Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 94%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 93%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Guided Precision Medicine Clinical Decision Support Tools: A Systematic Review 89%
- Measuring Quality-of-Care in Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Novel Application of Natural Language Processing 89%
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common health conditions in childhood and adolescence, school absence, and educational attainment: Mendelian randomization study 87%
- Evidence for a competitive relationship between executive functions and statistical learning 87%
- Effects of working memory load and CS-US intervals on delay eyeblink conditioning 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 92%
- Prevalence and Predictors of Depression among Training Physicians in China: A Comparison to the United States 90%
- Modified Harvard Step Testing within a Clinic Setting Enables Exercise Prescription for Cancer Survivors 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.