Back

Pilot Clinical Trial to test the function of a Diagnostic Sensor in predicting Impending Urinary Catheter Blockage in Long-term Catheterized Patients.

Heylen, R. A.; Mercer-Chalmers, J.; Moreton, A.; Urie, J.; Jefferies, E.; Patenall, B. L.; Laabei, M.; Jenkins, A. T. A.

2022-10-26 urology
10.1101/2022.10.25.22281351 medRxiv
Show abstract

Trial designPilot feasibility trial. MethodsO_ST_ABSParticipantsC_ST_ABSadults attending the Outpatient Urology Clinic, having a long-term indwelling urinary catheter and have the mental capacity to consent. Consent for the donation of the urinary catheter and drainage bag were gained at the Urology Clinic, Royal United Hospital (RUH) Bath, alongside a quality-of-life questionnaire. Interventionsthere was no direct intervention to the participants, the trial was to test the functionality of the diagnostic sensor, there was no change to the participants medical care. Objectivesrecruitment of 48 participants to donate catheter and drainage bags (including re-recruits); assess the functionality of the sensor to predict impending catheter blockage in human urine; assess the functionality to release at pH > 7; and assess the microbiological profile of the patients with long-term catheters. Outcomedetermination of whether the participant had a blockage event 3 weeks post catheter change, and whether this matched with the result from the sensor. Measurements of the participants urine to assess whether the sensor could detect human urine at a pH > 7. Determine the microbial species present in the drainage bag of the participants. ResultsO_ST_ABSRecruitmentC_ST_ABSreceived 35 samples from 28 individuals. Outcometwo participants reported blockage events which were successfully detected by the sensor. However, the sensor also predicted blockage in participants that did not block within the 3-week report time period, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 58.06%. The functionality of the sensor to detect urine above pH > 7 had a sensitivity = 78.75% and a specificity = 96.77%, which gave a p = 2.06x10-24 ({chi}2 test). Inclusion of the maintenance solution prescribed to participants, to test the predictability of the sensor, gave a sensitivity = 100%, and a specificity = 62.95%, p = 0.029 (Fisher Exact test). Microbiological analysis indicated that Proteus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were the most commonly isolated microbes. HarmNo adverse events. ConclusionsThe sensor can predict participants more prone to catheter blockage, and it is accurate in detecting urine with a pH >7. Owing to the small sample number of this trial, the results are not statistically powered. However, the data can be used to improve the design of the sensor and inform the design of a larger, randomized clinical trial. Trial registrationTrial was ethically approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) number: 20/LO/0094. Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) number: 261095. Fundingtrial was funded by the Urology Foundation and an IAA seed grant, University of Bath.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.