Occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide register-based study of the Danish workforce during the Covid-19 pandemic 2020-21
Bonde, J. P. E.; Begtrup, L. M.; Jensen, J. H.; Flachs, E. M.; Schlunssen, V.; Kolstad, H. A.; Jakobsson, K.; Nielsen, C.; Nielsson, K.; Rylander, L.; Vilhelmsson, A.; Petersen, K. K. U.; Toettenborg, S. S.
Show abstract
ObjectivesMost earlier studies on occupational risk of Covid-19 covering the entire workforce are based on relatively rare outcomes such as hospital admission and mortality. This study examines the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by occupational group based upon real-time polymerase chain reaction tests (RT-PCR). MethodsThe cohort includes 2.4 million Danish employees, 20-69 years of age. All data were retrieved from public registries. The sex-specific incidence rate ratios (IRR) of first-occurring positive RT-PCR test from week 8 of 2020 through week 50 of 2021 were computed by Poisson regression for each 4-digit DISCO-08 job code with more than 100 employees (337 in men; 297 in women). Occupational groups with low risk of workplace infection according to a job exposure matrix constituted the reference group. Risk estimates were adjusted by demographic, social and health characteristics including household size, completed Covid-19 vaccination, pandemic wave and occupation-specific frequency of testing. ResultsIRRs of SARS-CoV-2 infection were elevated in 34 occupations comprising 12 % of male employees and 45 occupations comprising 41 % of female employees. All IRR estimates were below 2.0. Decreased IRRs were observed in 85 occupations in men but none in women. DiscussionWe observed a modestly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees in numerous occupations indicating a large potential for preventive actions, especially in the female workforce. Cautious interpretation of observed risk in specific occupations is needed because of methodological issues inherent in analyses of RT-PCR-test results and because of multiple statistical tests. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC?O_LIEpidemiological studies suggest that the workplace contribute to the Covid-19 pandemic C_LIO_LIResults are mostly based upon studies of less frequent outcomes as Covid-19 morbidity or mortality which limits inference about risk in specific occupations C_LI WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSO_LIThe risk of Covid-19 infection was increased in 34 of 337 occupations in men and in 45 of 297 occupations in women C_LIO_LISome 12% of the Danish male workforce and 41% of the female workforce are at increased risk of Covid-19 infection C_LI HOW THIS RESEARCH MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY?O_LIPreventive actions targeting the workplace may contribute substantially to alleviate disease occurrence in the ongoing Covid-19 and similar future pandemics. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupation, Work-Related Contact, and SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Nucleocapsid Serological Status: Findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 97%
- Occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and reinfection during the second pandemic surge: a cohort study 96%
- Covid-19 Risk by work-related factors: Pooled analysis of individual linked data from 14 cohorts 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between support for workers with illness and work functioning impairment in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- A cross-sectional study of socioeconomic status and sickness presenteeism in Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in industry workers in Split-Dalmatia and Sibenik-Knin County, Croatia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated risk factors among frontline health care workers in Paris, France: the SEROCOV prospective cohort study 93%
- Seroincidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to and during the rollout of vaccines in a community-based prospective cohort of U.S. adults 91%
- Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations: A general population cohort study of 1.3 million 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- High seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among people living in precarious situations in Ile de France 92%
- COVID-19 mortality and excess mortality among working-age Californians, by occupational sector: March 2020 through November 2021 92%
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.