Back

Occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide register-based study of the Danish workforce during the Covid-19 pandemic 2020-21

Bonde, J. P. E.; Begtrup, L. M.; Jensen, J. H.; Flachs, E. M.; Schlunssen, V.; Kolstad, H. A.; Jakobsson, K.; Nielsen, C.; Nielsson, K.; Rylander, L.; Vilhelmsson, A.; Petersen, K. K. U.; Toettenborg, S. S.

2022-10-26 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2022.10.25.22281247 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesMost earlier studies on occupational risk of Covid-19 covering the entire workforce are based on relatively rare outcomes such as hospital admission and mortality. This study examines the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by occupational group based upon real-time polymerase chain reaction tests (RT-PCR). MethodsThe cohort includes 2.4 million Danish employees, 20-69 years of age. All data were retrieved from public registries. The sex-specific incidence rate ratios (IRR) of first-occurring positive RT-PCR test from week 8 of 2020 through week 50 of 2021 were computed by Poisson regression for each 4-digit DISCO-08 job code with more than 100 employees (337 in men; 297 in women). Occupational groups with low risk of workplace infection according to a job exposure matrix constituted the reference group. Risk estimates were adjusted by demographic, social and health characteristics including household size, completed Covid-19 vaccination, pandemic wave and occupation-specific frequency of testing. ResultsIRRs of SARS-CoV-2 infection were elevated in 34 occupations comprising 12 % of male employees and 45 occupations comprising 41 % of female employees. All IRR estimates were below 2.0. Decreased IRRs were observed in 85 occupations in men but none in women. DiscussionWe observed a modestly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees in numerous occupations indicating a large potential for preventive actions, especially in the female workforce. Cautious interpretation of observed risk in specific occupations is needed because of methodological issues inherent in analyses of RT-PCR-test results and because of multiple statistical tests. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC?O_LIEpidemiological studies suggest that the workplace contribute to the Covid-19 pandemic C_LIO_LIResults are mostly based upon studies of less frequent outcomes as Covid-19 morbidity or mortality which limits inference about risk in specific occupations C_LI WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSO_LIThe risk of Covid-19 infection was increased in 34 of 337 occupations in men and in 45 of 297 occupations in women C_LIO_LISome 12% of the Danish male workforce and 41% of the female workforce are at increased risk of Covid-19 infection C_LI HOW THIS RESEARCH MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY?O_LIPreventive actions targeting the workplace may contribute substantially to alleviate disease occurrence in the ongoing Covid-19 and similar future pandemics. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.