Back

Eliminate false positives in metagenomic profiling based on type IIB restriction sites

Sun, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, T.; Huang, S.; Weiss, S. T.; Liu, Y.-Y.

2022-10-25 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.10.24.513546 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate species identification and abundance estimation are critical for the interpretation of whole metagenome shotgun sequencing (WMS) data. Numerous computational methods, broadly referred to as metagenomic profilers, have been developed to identify species in microbiome samples by classification of sequencing reads and quantification of their relative abundances. Yet, existing metagenomic profilers typically suffer from false positive identifications and consequently biased relative abundance estimation (as false positives can be accounted for more than 90% of total identified species). Here, we present a new metagenomic profiler MAP2B (MetAgenomic Profiler based on type IIB restriction site) to resolve those issues. We first illustrate the pitfalls of using relative abundance as the only feature in determining false positives. We then propose a feature set to distinguish false positives from true positives. By benchmarking the performance in metagenomic profiling using data from CAMI2 (Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: second round of challenge), we illustrate the superior performance of MAP2B (F1 score ~ 0.93) over existing metagenomic profilers (F1 score ranges from 0.18 to 0.58). We further tested the performance of MAP2B using real WMS data from an ATCC mock community, confirming its superior performance and robustness against sequencing depth. In addition, by leveraging WMS data from an IBD cohort, we demonstrate the taxonomic features obtained by MAP2B can better discriminate disease status and predict metabolomic profiles.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.1%
2
iMeta
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.8%
4
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
5
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
6
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
9
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
10
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
12
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
14
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
27
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%