CNA Explorer and anaLyzer (CNAEL): an interactive web application and standard operating procedure enabling efficient clinical review and reporting of complex NGS-derived tumor copy number profiles
Chen, E.; Wang, J.; Kueffner, R.; Al-Kateb, H.; Silkov, A.; Uzilov, A.; Lochovsky, L.; Li, H.; Newman, S.
Show abstract
PurposeClinical analysis and reporting of somatically acquired copy number abnormalities (CNAs) detected through next-generation sequencing (NGS) is time consuming and requires significant expertise. Interpretation is complicated by other classes of variants such as coding mutations and gene fusions. Recent guidelines for the clinical assessment of tumor CNAs harmonize and simplify the reporting criteria but did not directly address NGS-specific concerns or the need for a standardized and scalable protocol for CNA analysis. MethodsWe developed a scalable NGS-derived CNA analysis protocol paired with a novel interactive web application, CNA Explorer and anaLyzer (CNAEL), to facilitate the rapid, scalable, and reproducible analysis and reporting of complex tumor-derived CNA profiles https://CNAEL.sema4.com. ResultsNovel features of CNAEL include on-the-fly data rescaling to account for tumor ploidy, purity, and modal chromosomal copy number; integration of gene expression, coding, and fusion variants into review and automated genome-wide summarization to enable rapid reporting. We found that case curation times were significantly reduced when using CNAEL [median:7 mins, IQR = 4, 10.25] compared with our previous laboratory standard operating procedure [median: 61 mins, IQR = 23.75, 176,25] with p=4.631e-05. ConclusionCNAEL enables efficient and accurate clinical review and reporting of complex NGS-derived tumor copy number profiles.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reducing Sanger Confirmation Testing through False Positive Prediction Algorithms 94%
- Genome Alert!: a standardized procedure for genomic variant reinterpretation and automated genotype-phenotype reassessment in clinical routine 92%
- The Gene Curation Coalition: A global effort to harmonize gene-disease evidence resources 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- OncoGEMINI: Software for Investigating Tumor Variants From Multiple Biopsies With Integrated Cancer Annotations 96%
- MetaRNN: Differentiating Rare Pathogenic and Rare Benign Missense SNVs and InDels Using Deep Learning 92%
- Evaluating Genome Sequencing Strategies: Trio, Singleton, and Standard Testing in Rare Disease Diagnosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- 3-hour genome sequencing and targeted analysis to rapidly assess genetic risk 90%
- Combined Bioinformatic and Splicing Analysis of Likely Benign Intronic and Synonymous Variants Reveals Evidence for Pathogenicity 90%
- Combining rare and common genetic variants improves population risk stratification for breast cancer 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.