Back

Comparative Effectiveness of Dexamethasone in Treatment of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients during the First Year of the Pandemic: The N3C Data Repository

Zhou, R.; Johnson, K. E.; Rousseau, J. F.; Rathouz, P. J.; The N3C Consortium,

2022-10-24 health informatics
10.1101/2022.10.22.22281373 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDexamethasone, a widely available glucocorticoid, was approved for use in hospitalized COVID-19 patients early in the pandemic based on the RECOVERY trial; however, evidence is still needed to support its real-world effectiveness in patients with a wide range of comorbidities and in diverse care settings. ObjectivesTo conduct a comparative effectiveness analysis of dexamethasone use with and without remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using electronic health record data. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective real-world effectiveness analysis using the harmonized, highly granular electronic health record data of the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Data Enclave. Analysis was restricted to COVID-19 patients in an inpatient setting, prior to vaccine availability. Primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcome was combined in-hospital death and severe outcome as defined by use of ECMO or mechanical ventilation during stay. Missing data were imputed with single imputation. Matching of dexamethasone-treated patients to non-dexamethasone-treated controls was accomplished using propensity score (PS) matching, stratified by remdesivir treatment and based on demographics, baseline laboratory values, and comorbidities. Treatment benefit was quantified using logistic regression. Further sensitivity analyses were performed using clinical adjusters in matched groups and in strata defined by quartiles of PS. ResultsRegression analysis revealed a statistically significant association between dexamethasone use and reduced risk of in-hospital mortality for those not receiving remdesivir (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.95, p=0.017), and a borderline statistically significant risk for those receiving remdesivir (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.02, p=0.054). Treatment also showed secondary outcome benefit. In sensitivity analyses, treatment effect size generally remained similar with some heterogeneity of benefit across strata of PS. ConclusionsWe add evidence that dexamethasone provides benefit with respect to mortality and severe outcomes in a diverse, national hospitalized sample, prior to vaccine availability.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.6%
2
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
23
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%