Detection of DNA replication errors and 8-oxo-dGTP-mediated mutations in E. coli by Duplex DNA Sequencing
Bhawsinghka, N.; Burkholder, A.; Schaaper, R.
Show abstract
Mutation is a phenomenon inescapable for all life-forms, including bacteria. While bacterial mutation rates are generally low due to the operation of error-avoidance systems, sometimes they are elevated by many orders of magnitude. Such a state, known as a hypermutable state, can result from exposure to stress or to harmful environments. Studies of bacterial mutation frequencies and analysis of the precise types of mutations can provide insights into the mechanisms by which mutations occur and the possible involvement of error-avoidance pathways. Several approaches have been used for this, like reporter assays involving non-essential genes or mutation accumulation over multiple generations. However, these approaches give an indirect estimation, and a more direct approach for determining mutations is desirable. With the recent development of a DNA sequencing technique known as Duplex Sequencing, it is possible to detect rare variants in a population at a frequency of 1 in 107 base pairs or less. Here, we have applied Duplex Sequencing to study spontaneous mutations in E. coli. We also investigated the production of replication errors by using a mismatch-repair defective (mutL) strain as well as oxidative-stress associated mutations using a mutT-defective strain. For DNA from a wild-type strain we obtained mutant frequencies in the range of 10-7 to 10-8 depending on the specific base-pair substitution, but we argue that these mutants merely represent a background of the system, rather than mutations that occurred in vivo. In contrast, bona-fide in vivo mutations were identified for DNA from both the mutL and mutT strains, as indicated by specific increases in base substitutions that are fully consistent with their established in vivo roles. Notably, the data reproduce the specific context effects of in vivo mutations as well as the leading vs. lagging strand bias among DNA replication errors.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Akaby - cell-free protein expression system for linear templates 94%
- Deuterium-depletion has no significant impact on the mutation rate of Escherichia coli, invalidating the Double D-Bridge Hypothesis 94%
- TReSR: A PCR-compatible DNA sequence design method for engineering proteins containing tandem repeats 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction of non-random mutational biases along a linear bacterial chromosome by the mismatch repair endonuclease NucS 94%
- Nanopore sequencing undergoes catastrophic sequence failure at inverted duplicated DNA sequences 94%
- Strategies to Identify and Edit Improvements in Synthetic Genome Segments Episomally. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of genetic interactions with priB links the PriA/PriB DNA replication restart pathway to double-strand DNA break repair in Escherichia coli 94%
- Analyses of Mutational Patterns Induced by Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde Reveal Similarity to a Common Mutational Signature 94%
- Genome archaeology of two laboratory Salmonella enterica enterica sv Typhimurium 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted chromosomal Escherichia coli:dnaB exterior surface residues regulate DNA helicase behavior to maintain genomic stability and organismal fitness 96%
- Repair of Mismatched Templates during Rad51-dependent Break-Induced Replication 95%
- ArdC protein overpasses the recipient hsdRMS restriction system broadening conjugation host range 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultrasensitive detection of Bacillus anthracis by real time PCR targeting a polymorphism in multi-copy 16S rRNA genes and their transcripts 93%
- Mutations in bdcA and valS correlate with quinolone resistance in wastewater Escherichia Coli 92%
- Regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis in mycobacteria: autogenous control of rpsO 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.