VStrains: De Novo Reconstruction of Viral Strains via Iterative Path Extraction From Assembly Graphs
Luo, R.; Lin, Y.
Show abstract
With the high mutation rate in viruses, a mixture of closely related viral strains (called viral quasispecies) often co-infect an individual host. Reconstructing individual strains from viral quasispecies is a key step to characterizing the viral population, revealing strain-level genetic variability, and providing insights into biomedical and clinical studies. Reference-based approaches of reconstructing viral strains suffer from the lack of high-quality references due to high mutation rates and biased variant calling introduced by a selected reference. De novo methods require no references but face challenges due to errors in reads, the high similarity of quasispecies, and uneven abundance of strains. In this paper, we propose VStrains, a de novo approach for reconstructing strains from viral quasispecies. VStrains incorporates contigs, paired-end reads, and coverage information to iteratively extract the strain-specific paths from assembly graphs. We benchmark VStrains against multiple state-of-the-art de novo and reference-based approaches on both simulated and real datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that VStrains achieves the best overall performance on both simulated and real datasets under a comprehensive set of metrics such as genome fraction, duplication ratio, NGA50, error rate, etc. AvailabilityVStrains is freely available at https://github.com/MetaGenTools/VStrains.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Robust and Scalable Graph Neural Network for Accurate Single Cell Classification 93%
- Accurate identification of structural variations from cancer samples 93%
- Graph Contrastive Learning of Subcellular-resolution Spatial Transcriptomics Improves Cell Type Annotation and Reveals Critical Molecular Pathways 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.