Comparison of COVID-19 Home-Testers vs Laboratory-Testers in New York State (Excluding New York City), November 2021 to April 2022
Dorabawila, V.; Barnes, V.; Ramesh, N.; Hoen, R.; Sommer, J.; Robbins, A.; Backenson, B.; Lutterloh, E.; Hoefer, D.; Rosenberg, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundThough the use of home testing is increasing, it is not represented in the reported coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) metrics. As the epidemic and its tracking evolve, it is critical to understand who the excluded home-tested persons are relative to those in reported metrics. MethodsFive New York State databases were linked to understand the trends in home-tested COVID-19 cases compared to laboratory-confirmed cases from November 2021 to April 2022. Frequency distributions, logistic regression adjusted odds ratios (aOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare the characteristics of home-tested and laboratory-tested persons. ResultsOf 592,227 confirmed COVID-19 cases, 71,531 (12%) had a home-test-only, 515,001 (87%) had a laboratory-test-only and 5,695 (1%) had both a home-test and laboratory-test during this period. Home-tested cases, as a percentage of confirmed COVID-19 cases, increased from 1% in November 2021 to 22% in April 2022. Children aged 5-11 years with 3.74 aOR (95% CI:3.53, 3.96) and adolescents aged 12-17 years with 3.24 aOR (95% CI:3.07, 3.43) were more likely to have home-test-only than adults aged 65 and above. Boosted (aOR 1.87, 95% CI:1.82, 1.93), in K-12 school settings (aOR 2.33, 95% CI:2.27, 2.40), or possibly infected by a household member (aOR 1.17, 95% CI:1.13, 1.22) were more likely to report home-test-only than laboratory-test-only. Individuals hospitalized (aOR 0.04, 95% CI:0.03, 0.06), with underlying conditions (aOR 0.85, 95% CI:0.83, 0.87), pregnant (aOR 0.76, 95% CI:0.66, 0.86), Hispanic (aOR 0.50:95% CI:0.48, 0.53), Asian (aOR 0.31, 95% CI:0.28, 0.34), or Black (aOR 0.45, 95% CI:0.42, 047) were less likely to utilize the home test only compared to the laboratory test only. ConclusionThe number of individuals using home tests only as a proportion of confirmed COVID-19 cases continues to increase. Home test-only cases are less likely to be hospitalized and have a lower potential for severe disease as measured by age, vaccination status, and underlying conditions. Thus, those with severe disease and the potential for severe disease are represented as official metrics. Racial and ethnic differences exist between persons reporting home and laboratory tests.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Demographic disparities in clinical outcomes of COVID-19: data from a statewide cohort in South Carolina 94%
- Clinical symptoms among ambulatory patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Prevalence and factors associated with antigen test positivity following SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Los Angeles 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Select Symptoms and Conditions 31 to 150 Days After Testing among Children and Adults 93%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in social housing areas in Denmark 93%
- Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive value of isolated symptoms for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children tested during peak circulation of the delta variant 95%
- Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020 95%
- Estimating the period prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron (BA.1) surge in New York City (NYC), January 1-March 16, 2022 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Participant-Collected, Mail-Based SARS-CoV-2 Serological Survey in Massachusetts, USA 94%
- Structural racism and COVID-19 response: Higher risk of exposure drives disparate COVID-19 deaths among Black and Hispanic/Latinx residents of Illinois, USA 93%
- Quantifying Contact Patterns in Response to COVID-19 Public Health Measures in Canada 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.