Back

Understanding Vascular Endothelial Cell Behavior Using a Mechanical Strain Gradient Generated by an Electromagnetic Stretching Device

Yang, M. L.; Zuo, C.; Liu, J.; Man, K.; Zuo, Z.; Yang, Y.

2022-10-21 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.10.20.513030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cardiovascular diseases cause an estimated 17.9 million deaths globally each year (World Health Organization). Endothelial cells that line the vasculature and the endocardium are subjected to cyclic mechanical stretch. Deviation from physiological stretch can alter the endothelial function, having the risk of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. To understand the mechanical stretch effects, cell culture platforms that provide mechanical stretch have been developed. However, most of them have fixed strain and frequency, sometime not in the pathophysiological range. We thus developed a novel, electromagnetically driven, uniaxial stretching device, where cells were grown on a flexible polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane mounted onto a 3-D printed track. The strain of the membrane was readily controlled by tailoring the track design and the frequency was determined by electromagnetic actuation. Furthermore, the mechanical strain gradient was generated on a PDMS membrane with a tapered thickness. This strain gradient, ranging from 1.5% to 40%, covered both physiological and pathological vascular stretch ranges. When human vascular endothelial cells were subjected to the cyclic stretch, the cells exhibited strain-dependent cell and nuclear orientation and elongation perpendicular to the stretching direction, compared to the random cell and nuclear orientation under the static condition. However, the overstretching led to deviation from the aforementioned orientation and elongation, and impaired the tight junctions, leading to a leaky endothelium. This novel, versatile, cost-effective, pathophysiologically relevant stretching device provides a useful platform for advancement of vascular disease research and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
5
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
19
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Cell Reports Physical Science
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
25
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
26
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
27
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
APL Bioengineering
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%