Back

Novel husbandry practices result in rapid rates of growth and sexual maturation without impacting adult behavior in the blind Mexican cavefish.

Kozol, R. A.; Yuiska, A.; Han, J.; Tolentino, B.; Lopatto, A.; Lewis, P.; Paz, A.; Keene, A. C.; Kowalko, J. E.; Duboue, E. R.

2022-10-21 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.10.19.512864 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of animal model systems is dependent on the standardization of husbandry protocols that increase fecundity and reduce generation time. The blind Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus, is an emerging genetic vertebrate model for evolution and biomedical research. Surface and cave populations of A. mexicanus have independently evolved, providing a model system for studying the genetic basis of divergent biological traits. While a rapid increase in the use of A. mexicanus has led to the generation of genetic tools including gene-editing and transgenesis, a slow and inconsistent growth rate remains a major limitation to the expanded application of A. mexicanus. The optimization of husbandry protocols that maximizes high-nutrient feed, smaller tank densities and larger tank sizes across development, would facilitate faster growth and expand the use of this model. Here, we describe standardized husbandry practices that optimize growth through a high protein diet, increased feeding, growth sorting of larvae and juveniles, and tank size transitions based on standard length. These changes to husbandry had a significant effect on growth rates and decreased the age of sexual maturity in comparison to our previous protocols. To determine whether our nutritional change and increased feeding impacted behavior, we tested fish in exploration and schooling assays. We found that a change in diet had no effect on the behaviors we tested, suggesting that increased feeding and rapid growth will not impact the natural variation in behavioral traits. Taken together, this standardized husbandry protocol will accelerate the development of A. mexicanus as a genetic model.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
2
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
4
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%