Back

Socioeconomic inequalities of Long COVID: findings from a population-based survey in the United Kingdom

Shabnam, S.; Razieh, C.; Dambha-Miller, H.; Yates, T.; Gillies, C.; Chudasama, Y. V.; Pareek, M.; Banerjee, A.; Kawachi, I.; Lacey, B.; Morris, E. J.; White, M.; Zaccardi, F.; Khunti, K.; Islam, N.

2022-10-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.10.19.22281254 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo estimate the risk of Long COVID by socioeconomic deprivation and to further examine the socioeconomic inequalities in Long COVID by sex and occupational groups. DesignWe analysed data from the COVID-19 Infection Survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics between 26/04/2020 and 31/01/2022. This is the largest and nationally representative survey of COVID-19 in the UK and provides uniquely rich, contemporaneous, and longitudinal data on occupation, health status, COVID-19 exposure, and Long COVID symptoms. SettingCommunity-based longitudinal survey of COVID-19 in the UK. ParticipantsWe included 201,799 participants in our analysis who were aged between 16 and 64 years and had a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Main outcome measuresWe used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the risk of Long COVID at least 4 weeks after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection by deciles of index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and adjusted for a range of demographic and spatiotemporal factors. We further examined the modifying effects of socioeconomic deprivation by sex and occupational groups. ResultsA total of 19,315 (9.6%) participants reported having Long COVID symptoms. Compared to the least deprived IMD decile, participants in the most deprived decile had a higher adjusted risk of Long COVID (11.4% vs 8.2%; adjusted OR: 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33, 1.57). There were particularly significantly higher inequalities (most vs least deprived decile) of Long COVID in healthcare and patient facing roles (aOR: 1.76; 1.27, 2.44), and in the education sector (aOR: 1.62; 1.26, 2.08). The inequality of Long COVID was higher in females (aOR: 1.54; 1.38, 1.71) than males (OR: 1.32; 1.15, 1.51). ConclusionsParticipants living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas had a higher risk of Long COVID. The inequality gap was wider in females and certain public facing occupations (e.g., healthcare and education). These findings will help inform public health policies and interventions in adopting a social justice and health inequality lens.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.7%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
4
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
15
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
20
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
27
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%