Back

Towards 3D Deep Learning for neuropsychiatry: predicting Autism diagnosis using an interpretable Deep Learning pipeline applied to minimally processed structural MRI data

Garcia, M.; Kelly, C.

2022-10-20 health informatics
10.1101/2022.10.18.22281196 medRxiv
Show abstract

1By capitalizing on the power of multivariate analyses of large datasets, predictive modeling approaches are enabling progress toward robust and reproducible brain-based markers of neuropsychiatric conditions. While Deep Learning offers a particularly promising avenue to further advance progress, there are challenges related to implementation in 3D (best for MRI) and interpretability. Here, we address these challenges and describe an interpretable predictive pipeline for inferring Autism diagnosis using 3D Deep Learning applied to minimally processed structural MRI scans. We trained 3D Deep Learning models to predict Autism diagnosis using the openly available ABIDE I and II datasets (n = 1329, split into training, validation, and test sets). Importantly, we did not perform transformation to template space, to reduce bias and maximize sensitivity to structural alterations associated with Autism. Our models attained predictive accuracies equivalent to those of previous Machine Learning studies, while side-stepping the time- and resource-demanding requirement to first normalize data to a template, thus minimizing the time required to generate predictions. Further, our interpretation step, which identified brain regions that contributed most to accurate inference, revealed regional Autism-related alterations that were highly consistent with the literature, such as in a left-lateralized network of regions supporting language processing. We have openly shared our code and models to enable further progress towards remaining challenges, such as the clinical heterogeneity of Autism, and to enable the extension of our method to other neuropsychiatric conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.