Back

Child and family experiences of a whole-system approach to physical activity: a citizen science evaluation protocol

Frazer, M.-T.; Seims, A.; Tatterton, M. J.; Lockyer, B.; Bingham, D. D.; Barber, S. E.; Daly-Smith, A.; Hall, J.

2022-10-20 public and global health
10.1101/2022.10.18.22281188 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionWhole systems approaches are being adopted to tackle physical inactivity. The mechanisms contributing to changes resulting from whole system approaches are not fully understood. The voices of children and families that these approaches are designed for need to be heard to understand what is working, for whom, where, and in what context. This paper describes the protocol for the children and families citizen science evaluation of the JU:MP programme, a whole systems approach to increasing physical activity in children and young people aged 5-14 years in Bradford, UK. Methods and analysisThe evaluation aims to understand the lived experiences of children and families relationship with physical activity and participation in the JU:MP programme. The study takes a collaborative and contributory citizen science approach, including focus groups, parent-child dyad interviews and participatory research. Feedback and data will guide changes within this study and the JU:MP programme. We also aim to examine participant experience of citizen science and the suitability of a citizen science approach to evaluate a whole systems approach. Data will be analysed using Framework approach alongside iterative analysis with and by citizen scientists in the collaborative citizen science study. Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been granted by The University of Bradford: Study One (E891-focus groups as part of the control trial, E982-parent-child dyad interviews), Study Two (E992). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the participants, through schools or directly. The citizen scientists input to create further dissemination opportunities. Article SummaryO_ST_ABSStrengths and Limitations of this studyC_ST_ABSO_LIThis protocol is the first, to our knowledge, to describe a citizen science-based evaluation of a whole systems approach to physical activity with children and families. C_LIO_LIThe novel and innovative study design allows children and families to be at the centre of our understanding of what encourages and discourages them to be active. C_LIO_LIBy conducting citizen science as part of a reactive process evaluation, improvements to the research and the implementation can be made in real time, centred around those who matter most C_LIO_LIThe study emphasises the importance of the research participant experience within citizen science and sets out how to evaluate and improve experience. C_LIO_LILimitations include a small sample size. Whilst this is intentional as it will allow us to capture in depth, meaningful data over time, it will likely make it more difficult to capture a diverse range of experiences. There is an option for the children participating in the collaborative citizen science study to conduct research amongst their wider peers, this is dependent on whether they want to do this, to allow them freedom and ownership over the research C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.