Exploring the needs and uses for drones in medical emergencies in England and Scotland: a survey of emergency healthcare workers
Theoret, O.; Barrack, S.; Morgan, H. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe application of drones in healthcare is a new concept being introduced in various countries to fly medical supplies. Public perceptions have been investigated but the perceptions of healthcare professionals on the frontline have not been explored. This study examined the perceptions of emergency care providers in England and Scotland to determine how they believe drones could be used when providing emergency care. MethodsFrontline healthcare professionals were surveyed regarding their perceptions of drones in emergency medical scenarios. A survey with 27 questions built on SNAP 11 was published on social media for participant recruitment. ResultsThematic analysis yielded insights into what healthcare professionals believe should be flown in an emergency notably: blood, defibrillators, and medication. Drones are perceived to be beneficial for life-threatening scenarios (high-risk, time-critical, trauma, search, and rescue applications) and routine medical care such as delivery of medical supplies and minor interventions. 100% of participants believed that providing medical care could benefit from a drone flying to a remote area or directly to a patient. 76% believed that having a drone fly key medical equipment faster could change the outcome of a patient. Scepticism regarding regulations and logistics involved, as well as concern for drone-based medical care, were identified by participants. ConclusionDrone use in healthcare remains an immature field and this study confirms that this domain warrants further research. It is key to remember that the perspectives of those impacted by the integration of drones will have to be explored to guide the application.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 94%
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 94%
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 94%
- International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak 94%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 94%
- Knowledge, attitude and practice toward COVID-19 among healthcare workers in public health facilities, Eastern Ethiopia 93%
- Hospital based contact tracing of COVID-19 patients and health care workers and risk stratification of exposed health care workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Eastern India 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.