Synthetic electronic health records generated with variational graph autoencoders
Nikolentzos, G.; Vazirgiannis, M.; Xypolopoulos, C.; Lingman, M.; Brandt, E.
Show abstract
Data-driven medical care delivery must always respect patient privacy - a requirement that is not easily met. This issue have impeded improvements to healthcare software and have delayed the long-predicted prevalence of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Until now, it has been very difficult to share data between healthcare organizations, resulting in poor statistical models due to unrepresentative patient cohorts. Synthetic data, i. e., artificial but realistic electronic health records, could overcome the drought that is troubling the healthcare sector. Deep neural network architectures in particular have shown an incredible ability to learn from complex data sets, and generate large amounts of unseen data points with the same statistical properties as the training data. Here, we present a generative neural network model that can create synthetic health records with realistic timelines. These clinical trajectories are generated on a per-patient basis and are represented as linear-sequence graphs of clinical events over time. We use a variational graph autoencoder (VGAE) to generate synthetic samples from real-world electronic health records. Our approach generates health records not seen in the training data. We show that these artificial patient trajectories are realistic and preserve patient privacy, and can therefore support safe sharing of data across organizations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Creating a computer assisted ICD coding system: performance metric choice and use of the ICD hierarchy 95%
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 94%
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.